on 2007-04-12 14:13
on 2007-04-12 15:03
on 2007-04-12 15:04
vim, and when not on Linux, unixutils. Jason
on 2007-04-12 15:05
vim, sometimes JEdit sk
on 2007-04-12 15:08
i am in linux so i have textmate - envy. scribes comes pretty close, i think, in workflow though. sk
on 2007-04-12 15:15
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:01:07 +0900, John Joyce wrote: > TextMate! Geany!
on 2007-04-12 15:36
Well, I should've written "vi, emacs, irb and commandline do not count", but that would've given me some flames ;-) BTW, does textmate support debugging?
on 2007-04-12 15:39
On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:35 AM, ChrisKaelin wrote: > BTW, does textmate support debugging? Not really. It doesn't have a built-in debugger, if that's what you meant. James Edward Gray II
on 2007-04-12 15:47
On 4/12/07, ChrisKaelin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > Well, I should've written "vi, emacs, irb and commandline do not > count", but that would've given me some flames ;-) Not a flame: how do they not count? IDE stands for "Integrated Development Environment". I can't speak for VI users, but Emacs has Ruby source code editing, project management, the ability to cross-reference code symbols, auto-completion, source templates, integrated source-level debugging (if you want it), IRB, and the ability to run your code and tests right from the editor. What's missing that it fails to qualify as an IDE?
on 2007-04-12 16:14
Huh? That's just arbitrary nonsense! (this may be a flame) I dare you to define IDE under pain of slashdotting. (why is slashdot so flamey?) Seriously though, editors are viable as IDEs if they do the sending to the compiler/parser. TextMate, like EMACS is often more of a nexus of tools, but isn't that what the "I" in IDE is all about? From that note, what constitutes debugging? Stepping through a program with breakpoints? Perhaps, but no. Debugging is simply removing the bugs by any means necessary. irb is an unusual case only seriously matched by shell code and SmallTalk.
on 2007-04-12 16:35
i love these favorite editor / ide threads, i am always looking for a new one to play around with. I have always found the coolest things in these threads. sk
on 2007-04-14 02:50
Hi all, On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:46:16 +0900, Avdi Grimm wrote: > (if you want it), IRB, and the ability to run your code and tests > right from the editor. What's missing that it fails to qualify as an > IDE? How can this http://platypope.org/yada/emacs-demo/ not be considered an IDE? PS - I don't use Emacs. I use Vim + any nix utilities I need.
on 2007-04-15 00:19
I've used just about every IDE there is and Textmate blows them all out of the water.
on 2007-04-15 01:04
Raymond O'Connor wrote: > I've used just about every IDE there is and Textmate blows them all out > of the water. > Yes it does ... and it's very inexpensive ... less than $100US for the software, which is not open source, and about $1000US for a base iMac. :) -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P) http://borasky-research.net/ If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits fire.
on 2007-04-15 01:12
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > Raymond O'Connor wrote: >> I've used just about every IDE there is and Textmate blows them all >> out of the water. >> > Yes it does ... and it's very inexpensive ... less than $100US for the > software, which is not open source, and about $1000US for a base iMac. :) Does that mean, you'd be willing to donate Textmate and an iMac to me? ;P -- Phillip "CynicalRyan" Gawlowski http://cynicalryan.110mb.com/ http://clothred.rubyforge.org Rule of Open-Source Programming #11: When a developer says he will work on something, he or she means "maybe".