I am running ruby 1.9.2p290 and Rails 3.0.9 on OSX Lion
When I run bundle install, it installs into rmagick directory and
creates subfolders for ruby/1.9.1/gems…
Why is bundle installing gems under 1.9.1/gems ?
Thanks
I am running ruby 1.9.2p290 and Rails 3.0.9 on OSX Lion
When I run bundle install, it installs into rmagick directory and
creates subfolders for ruby/1.9.1/gems…
Why is bundle installing gems under 1.9.1/gems ?
Thanks
On Jul 29, 9:04am, Pete [email protected] wrote:
I am running ruby 1.9.2p290 and Rails 3.0.9 on OSX Lion
When I run bundle install, it installs into rmagick directory and
creates subfolders for ruby/1.9.1/gems…Why is bundle installing gems under 1.9.1/gems ?
Well it’s installed it into a folder called rmagick because you’ve
accidentally told it to do so by doing bundle install rmagick (bundle
install doesn’t allow you to install specific gems, it looks like it
interprets an argument passed to it as a path. That setting is stored
in the app’s .bundle/config)
The hierarchy inside that folder is (I believe) because bundler is
replicating rubygems layout. It’s 1.9.1 rather than 1.9.2 because
1.9.1 is the api version number (much like how on 1.8.7, gems would
have gone in a folder called just 1.8)
Fred
Thank you so much - this was driving me crazy!!!
bundle path in config was set to rmagick
BUNDLE_PATH: rmagick
On Jul 29, 1:17am, Frederick C. [email protected]
Same here! I ended up having all gems in ./asin, which was painful…
even ‘whole project search’ in rubymine was finding things there
bundle install should warn about this…
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs