I’m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter
produces gibberish:
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html
Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can’t imagine
anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter)
Aslak
does this mean that:
rake spec:doc
will not produce plain text specdocs?
On Nov 12, 2007 12:45 AM, s.ross [email protected] wrote:
does this mean that:
rake spec:doc
will not produce plain text specdocs?
No, spec:doc will remain untouched.
I’m not talking about --format specdoc (which the spec:doc task uses),
but --format rdoc, which is supposed to create RDoc - a file you can
include in your RDocs. Since it’s not producing what RDoc needs, I’d
like to retire it.
Aslak
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:49 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:
I’m not talking about --format specdoc (which the spec:doc task uses),
but --format rdoc, which is supposed to create RDoc - a file you can
include in your RDocs. Since it’s not producing what RDoc needs, I’d
like to retire it.
I didn’t even know it could do that, so I won’t miss it. I live off
autotest + HTML (via TM).
Ashley
–
blog @ http://aviewfromafar.net/
linked-in @ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
currently @ home
On Nov 11, 2007 8:39 PM, aslak hellesoy [email protected]
wrote:
I’m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter
produces gibberish:
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html
Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can’t imagine
anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter)
Go ahead, I didn’t know was there
HTML output is more fancy than RDoc
–
Luis L.
Multimedia systems
Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort,
which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that
is worthwhile.
Vince Lombardi