Versions?

I’m using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
are failing. I can’t believe I’m the only one who has encountered these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?

On Mar 4, 12:17 pm, Jeff S. [email protected] wrote:

I’m using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
are failing. I can’t believe I’m the only one who has encountered these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?

I don’t believe it’s supposed to work on Ruby 1.9 yet.

On 4 Mar 2009, at 20:17, Jeff S. wrote:

I’m using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple
things
are failing. I can’t believe I’m the only one who has encountered
these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?

2.3 is only an RC and ruby 1.9.1 is rather cutting edge so a few
issues are out there (hence why it’s an RC)

khiltd wrote:

On Mar 4, 12:17 pm, Jeff S. [email protected] wrote:

I’m using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
are failing. I can’t believe I’m the only one who has encountered these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?

I don’t believe it’s supposed to work on Ruby 1.9 yet.

Thanks; I guess I’m breaking new wind here.

Frederick C. wrote:

2.3 is only an RC and ruby 1.9.1 is rather cutting edge so a few
issues are out there (hence why it’s an RC)

Fair enough. I went with 2.3 because that’s what the Rails Guides
cover. I chose 1.9 because it’s supposedly a pretty major upgrade.

I’m willing to deal with a few issues; in fact, it would probably be a
great learning experience to find & fix a few bugs. At least this
explains why I’m not seeing reports of other people having the same
problems.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs