I am using two USRP N210s (daughter boards are XCVR2450) and the
supported
frequency in theory ranged in 2.4GHz ~ 2.5GHz. I have done experiment to
test the working freq using benchmark_tx/benchmark_rx, the working freq
is
2.41G, 2,42G, 243G, 2.44G, 2.46G, 2.47G, 2.48G, 2.49G, 2.50G, 2.51G,
2.52G.
But when I tested tunnel.py, the working freq is only 2.50 G and 2.51G.
Why
doesn’t tunnel.py work on the same frequencies as
benchmark_tx/benchmark_rx?
On 06/19/2012 02:30 PM, Weixian Z. wrote:
I am using two USRP N210s (daughter boards are XCVR2450) and the supported
frequency in theory ranged in 2.4GHz ~ 2.5GHz. I have done experiment to
test the working freq using benchmark_tx/benchmark_rx, the working freq is
2.41G, 2,42G, 243G, 2.44G, 2.46G, 2.47G, 2.48G, 2.49G, 2.50G, 2.51G, 2.52G.
But when I tested tunnel.py, the working freq is only 2.50 G and 2.51G. Why
doesn’t tunnel.py work on the same frequencies as benchmark_tx/benchmark_rx?
I believe there was a bug that was fixed if you see this thread:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/4402826
What version of UHD are you running? If you update to latest
master/maint you will get this fix. I think it is worth trying.
-josh
anyone has idea?