I am trying to migrate from home-made daughterboard code to the code by
Trondeau. I am using the version 9305. I use db_flexrf_1800_tx_mimo_b.
After changing “d_common->R_DIV(1)” to “d_common->R_DIV(16)” the signal
is
showing up on my spectrum analyzer at the correct frequency. However,
the
amplitude is about 25dB weaker than when using the home-made
daughterboard
code. I am using the daughterboard code as given by the code fragment
below.
Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong ?
I am trying to migrate from home-made daughterboard code to the code by
Trondeau. I am using the version 9305. I use db_flexrf_1800_tx_mimo_b.
After changing “d_common->R_DIV(1)” to “d_common->R_DIV(16)” the signal is
showing up on my spectrum analyzer at the correct frequency. However, the
amplitude is about 25dB weaker than when using the home-made daughterboard
code. I am using the daughterboard code as given by the code fragment
below. Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong ?
The DB code sets the gain in the 9862 to the wrong value (there is
something
wrong with the calculation of the register value from the gain in db) -
this
may be fixed in the cppdb feature branch.
On Monday 06 October 2008 19:31:04 Stefan Brüns wrote:
The DB code sets the gain in the 9862 to the wrong value (there is
something wrong with the calculation of the register value from the gain in
db) - this may be fixed in the cppdb feature branch.
On Monday 06 October 2008 20:30:36 Stefan Brüns wrote:
On Monday 06 October 2008 19:31:04 Stefan Brüns wrote:
The DB code sets the gain in the 9862 to the wrong value (there is
something wrong with the calculation of the register value from the gain
in db) - this may be fixed in the cppdb feature branch.
Patch attached.
Stefan
Sorry, wrong one, only the last hunk is the correct part.
Attached again.
Stefan
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.