Svn+http on RubyForge


#1

Hi all -

Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http for
read-only access to the svn repositories. For example:

====================
$ svn checkout http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/ mongrel
A mongrel/test
A mongrel/test/test_command.rb
A mongrel/test/test_redirect_handler.rb
A mongrel/test/test_response.rb
A mongrel/test/test_stats.rb
[ … etc … ]

Enjoy!

Yours,

Tom
http://generatingparserswithjavacc.com/


#2

On 7/21/07, Tom C. removed_email_address@domain.invalid wrote:

A mongrel/test/test_response.rb

Great news and a good occasion to say thanks to Tom for the great work
:slight_smile:

Cheers
Robert


#3

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Tom C. wrote:

Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http for
read-only access to the svn repositories.

Nice, thanks! I had to “tunnel” through our own server in order to
checkout the current rubyforge mocha project at my current contract
work.
It took me several calls, some month and a half of waiting and a formal
request for my client company to open the SVN port and then only to my
own
machine … ;-). Life will be easier now.
*t


#4

On Jul 21, 2007, at 11:01 , Robert D. wrote:

On 7/21/07, Tom C. removed_email_address@domain.invalid wrote:

Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http
for
read-only access to the svn repositories. For example:

Great news and a good occasion to say thanks to Tom for the great
work :slight_smile:

Even better would be to give a tangible “thank you” to Tom for doing
such a damn fine job of maintaining and improving a critical resource
to all of us. He likes dark beer and porter. I was thinking of
getting some donations via paypal and sending him a thank you gift he
could really appreciate.

If you’re interested, let me know and I’ll see what we can do.

P.S. I don’t drink so suggestions on dark beer / porter that can be
ordered and shipped via the interwebs would be appreciated.


#5

On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 10:52 +0900, Ryan D. wrote:

Even better would be to give a tangible “thank you” to Tom for doing
such a damn fine job of maintaining and improving a critical resource
to all of us. He likes dark beer and porter. I was thinking of
getting some donations via paypal and sending him a thank you gift he
could really appreciate.

If you’re interested, let me know and I’ll see what we can do.

P.S. I don’t drink so suggestions on dark beer / porter that can be
ordered and shipped via the interwebs would be appreciated.

Thanks to all for the kind words! And should I receive beer, I promise
not to do any sysadmin work on RubyForge after drinking it :slight_smile:

Yours,

Tom


#6

On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 06:10 +0900, Tomas P.'s Mailing L. wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Tom C. wrote:

Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http for
read-only access to the svn repositories.

Nice, thanks! I had to “tunnel” through our own server in order to
checkout the current rubyforge mocha project at my current contract work.
It took me several calls, some month and a half of waiting and a formal
request for my client company to open the SVN port and then only to my own
machine … ;-). Life will be easier now.

Cool. I hope to get svn+https up and running at some point too. As far
as I can tell, it seems like svn+ssh and svn+https are mutually
exclusive for the same svn repo - either the filesystem has to handle
the permissions or mod_dav_svn has to. I’m working on a automated way
for a project admin to elect one or another… we shall see…

Yours,

Tom


#7

Ryan D. wrote:

such a damn fine job of maintaining and improving a critical resource to

Email me off list for some links to the best beer in the world from
right here in Oregon, USA. :slight_smile: The breweries themselves don’t appear to
ship, but there are retailers who do.


#8
  • Tom C. (removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

machine … ;-). Life will be easier now.

Cool. I hope to get svn+https up and running at some point too. As far
as I can tell, it seems like svn+ssh and svn+https are mutually
exclusive for the same svn repo - either the filesystem has to handle
the permissions or mod_dav_svn has to. I’m working on a automated way
for a project admin to elect one or another… we shall see…

Try using mod_auth_pam to defer HTTP authentication to PAM; then people
don’t have to pick and choose.


#9

On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 22:41 +0900, Paul D. wrote:

  • Tom C. (removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

Cool. I hope to get svn+https up and running at some point too. As far
as I can tell, it seems like svn+ssh and svn+https are mutually
exclusive for the same svn repo - either the filesystem has to handle
the permissions or mod_dav_svn has to. I’m working on a automated way
for a project admin to elect one or another… we shall see…

Try using mod_auth_pam to defer HTTP authentication to PAM; then people
don’t have to pick and choose.

Cool, I’ll look into that…

Thanks,

Tom