Hi all,
I get a really strange error… I have 2 simple models:
class Membre < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :adhesion
end
class Adhesion < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :membre
end
The relation works well in the console. I can find a Membre and get
its Adhesion, or find an Adhesion and get the Member.
Now in a controler/view… If I find like this:
@adhesion = Adhesion.find_by_membre_id(id)
I can use @adhesion in the view without any problem.
But if I do:
@adhesion = Membre.find(id).adhesion (what is more clean and logical)
I get an error in the view, as soon as I try to read any field/method
of @adhesion.
What confuses me is that in both cases, the content of @adhesion is
the same in the view:
#<Adhesion id: 1, membre_id: 51, type: nil, date_adhesion: nil,
date_expiration: nil, created_at: “2009-01-06 14:21:06”, updated_at:
“2009-01-06 14:21:06”>
#<Adhesion id: 1, membre_id: 51, type: nil, date_adhesion: nil,
date_expiration: nil, created_at: “2009-01-06 14:21:06”, updated_at:
“2009-01-06 14:21:06”>
The failing view:
<%= @adhesion.inspect %>
<%=
if @adhesion.date_adhesion.nil? # line 9 is here #
“You don’t have adhesion.”
%>
The error:
You have a nil object when you didn’t expect it!
You might have expected an instance of Array.
The error occurred while evaluating nil.include?
/Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.2/lib/active_record/
attribute_methods.rb:142:in create_time_zone_conversion_attribute?' /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.2/lib/active_record/ attribute_methods.rb:75:in
define_attribute_methods’
/Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.2/lib/active_record/
attribute_methods.rb:71:in each' /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.2/lib/active_record/ attribute_methods.rb:71:in
define_attribute_methods’
/Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.2/lib/active_record/
attribute_methods.rb:350:in respond_to?' /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.2/lib/active_record/ associations/association_proxy.rb:209:in
method_missing’
app/views/membre/adhesion.erb:9
Any idea welcome!
Read you,
Jej