Hi,
Anyone knows the status of Rubinius?
It seems as if it has lost a lot of momentum, and I wonder if they are
still committed to be an alternative to CRuby. Or if they’ll end up
merging into mruby.
Hi,
Anyone knows the status of Rubinius?
It seems as if it has lost a lot of momentum, and I wonder if they are
still committed to be an alternative to CRuby. Or if they’ll end up
merging into mruby.
Am Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:36:59 +0900
schrieb Marc H. [email protected]:
Hi,
Anyone knows the status of Rubinius?
It seems as if it has lost a lot of momentum, and I wonder if they are
still committed to be an alternative to CRuby. Or if they’ll end up
merging into mruby.
As far as I can tell, Rubinius doesn’t lose any momentum. Their
GitHub page is quite active and every day a good number of commits
happen: GitHub - rubinius/rubinius: The Rubinius Language Platform
They seem to target at version 2.0.0 now, and I’m really looking
forward to this due to the 1.9 compatibility. The development versions
I compiled from the git repoistory were already quite capable of 1.9.
What I’m missing most currently is (s)printf with named substituations
à la “%{name}”, because they are really good for translation files.
Vale,
Marvin
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs