Hi
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/
Does someone know why this is not called 1.9/ instead?
Hi
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/
Does someone know why this is not called 1.9/ instead?
Marc H. wrote in post #1049952:
Hi
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/
Does someone know why this is not called 1.9/ instead?
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2010/08/18/ruby-1-9.2-released/
See FAQ section:
Standard library is installed in /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1
This version is a “library compatible version.” Ruby 1.9.2 is almost
1.9.1 compatible, so the library is installed in the 1.9.1 directory.
–
Luis L.
Never made much bloody sense to me either.
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs