Shoes-cucumber 0.0.2 released!

Ruby
1

shoes-cucumber 0.0.2 has been released!

shoes-cucumber is a set of expectations that allows you to write
Cucumber tests for your Shoes apps.

Given the sub-1.0 version number, this library is obviously
experimental.

Tobias P. contributed all of the code that’s gone into this
release. He’s awesome. :slight_smile:

Example:

Scenario: Clicking on Alert results in a popup
Given the Shoes application in “features/example_programs/simple.rb”
When I click the button labeled “Alert!”
Then a popup with text “Hello World!” should appear

Changes:

0.0.2 / 2011-09-25

  • Major enhancements:

shoes-mocks now extracted out into its own library in its own right.

10 step definitions provided, mostly around the stuff that shoes-mocks
0.0.2 is able to do.

2

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 02:38:25PM +0900, Steve K. wrote:

shoes-cucumber 0.0.2 has been released!

Neither this nor shoes-mocks has any license information that I have
found. It might seem reasonable to assume that they are distributed
under the same terms as shoes, but lawyers and judges would surely
disagree with that.

3

Derp. I’ll push up one a new one in a bit, but until then, like
everything I
do, they’re wtfpl 'd.

4

Does this open the door to rspec testing with shoes?

More shoes-mocks than shoes-cucumber, but yes. You can see some
examples here: shoes-deprecated/features at develop · shoes/shoes-deprecated · GitHub

5

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Steve K. [email protected]
wrote:

shoes-cucumber 0.0.2 has been released!

shoes-cucumber is a set of expectations that allows you to write
Cucumber tests for your Shoes apps.

Does this open the door to rspec testing with shoes?

Awesome project idea. fork’d.

Andrew McElroy

6

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:58:47PM +0900, Steve K. wrote:

Derp. I’ll push up one a new one in a bit, but until then, like everything I
do, they’re wtfpl 'd.

Good to know. Thank you.

7

Thanks for pointing it out. I usually remember…

8

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:17:45AM +0900, Steve K. wrote:

Thanks for pointing it out. I usually remember…

Checking for licenses is generally one of the very first things I do
when
looking at a new piece of software, so I tend to notice the lack of such
information. I’m glad you place a reasonable level of value on letting
people know what license applies to your work (and I’m glad you choose a
copyfree license).