We’ve started using seeds.rb to populate some low-level required data
into our database, but we’re having some issues with this data getting
removed and not re-entered while running the tests.
Is seeding part of the testing lifecycle or do we have to replicate
the seed data in the fixtures as well?
My guess is that you’d need to add this to your test setup. By
default, everything is rolled back from your test database after every
test.
def setup
rake db:seed
end
With backticks it will run the shell process, and should wait for it
to finish before proceeding.
Nothing comes up when I search the api docs for ‘seed’, so for now it
may just be in rake. It may take some digging in the source to find
out whether you can seed the database directly from Rails. Or there
may be a gem that can help.
I’m a bit new to the Rails stuff, but what’s the expected convention
for running the tests.
I’ve been doing -
rake db:setup RAILS_ENV=test
rake test:unit RAILS_ENV=test
Just to make sure I’m not fighting the conventions.
If you run
rake -T test
in your project directory, you can see all your available test tasks.
Two helpful ones are:
rake db:test:clone
rake db:test:load
Oh, another option for your original problem is to turn off db
rollbacks in your test environment. Unfortunately I can’t remember the
option for doing that. Just keep in mind that you’ll want to manually
clear out the database occasionally or you may see your tests slow
down.
I’d recommend installing Autotest. (Also give serious thought to
RSpec.)
Seriously. This is super helpful. Also, you may want to look into
something like factory_girl. If your tests aren’t really coupled to
your seed data, they just need dummy records for your models, this may
be a better way to go. That way your tests don’t assume particular
records in your database.
Nathan B. wrote:
I’m a bit new to the Rails stuff, but what’s the expected convention
for running the tests.
I’ve been doing -
rake db:setup RAILS_ENV=test
rake test:unit RAILS_ENV=test
Just to make sure I’m not fighting the conventions.
I’d recommend installing Autotest. (Also give serious thought to
RSpec.)
Best,
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
[email protected]
On Sep 28, 12:53 pm, sax [email protected] wrote:
Oh, another option for your original problem is to turn off db
your seed data, they just need dummy records for your models, this may
be a better way to go. That way your tests don’t assume particular
records in your database.
Unfortunately, it’s not the tests that depend upon the data, it’s the
code itself. The seed data is reference data, which is basically just
one step above an enumeration.