This invokation runs fine, but generates so much output:
ruby -rubygems excelparse.rb stuff.xls
so I piped it to head and it bombs:
ruby -rubygems excelparse.rb stuff.xls|head
Row: 0 Cell: 0> Dispapp
Row: 0 Cell: 1> Iprc
Row: 0 Cell: 2> UH tag
Row: 0 Cell: 3> Weight
Row: 0 Cell: 4> Tags removed
Row: 0 Cell: 5> Disk removed or wiped
Row: 1 Cell: 0> 80118
Row: 1 Cell: 1> 1173
Row: 1 Cell: 2> 961SU
Row: 2 Cell: 0> 80118
excelparse.rb:19:in write': Broken pipe (Errno::EPIPE) from excelparse.rb:19:inputs’
from excelparse.rb:19
from excelparse.rb:15:in each' from excelparse.rb:15 from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/parseexcel-0.5.2/lib/parseexcel/worksheet.rb:143:ineach’
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/parseexcel-0.5.2/lib/parseexcel/worksheet.rb:143:in
`each’
from excelparse.rb:11
Any hints? The script itself is a minor mod of the example given at
the parseexcel site (see below).
Mahalo,
Dave
cat excelparse.rb
require ‘parseexcel’
#Open the excel file passed in from the commandline
workbook = Spreadsheet::ParseExcel.parse(ARGV[0])
#Get the first worksheet
worksheet = workbook.worksheet(0)
j=0 #cycle over every row
worksheet.each { |row|
i=0
if row != nil #cycle over each cell in this row if it’s not an empty row
row.each { |cell|
if cell != nil #Get the contents of the cell as a string
contents = cell.to_s(‘latin1’)
puts “Row: #{j} Cell: #{i}> #{contents}”
end
i = i+1
}
end
j=j+1
}
each' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/parseexcel-0.5.2 /lib/parseexcel/worksheet.rb:143:in each’
from excelparse.rb:11
Any hints? The script itself is a minor mod of the example given at
the parseexcel site (see below).
It’s a very random guess, but is the EPIPE possibly happening because
`head’
closed the connection after reading 10 lines? What happens if you run it
like this…?
ruby -rubygems excelparse.rb stuff.xls 2>&1 | less
So to get my script to act like a responsible command line citizen,
I’d need to insert some error handling and return normally when the
pipe breaks, right?
So to get my script to act like a responsible command line citizen,
I’d need to insert some error handling and return normally when the
pipe breaks, right?
Since your script is, basically, in the business of doing IO, then yes,
it is probably worth catching IO exceptions and exiting cleanly.
Row: 1 Cell: 0> 80118
So to get my script to act like a responsible command line citizen,
I’d need to insert some error handling and return normally when the
pipe breaks, right?
Well, it depends. If you consider it an error when the script is not
able to deliver all output the default behavior is ok. I usually do not
bother to deal with this situation because I use head and tail from the
command line only and I know what to expect there.
Kind regards
robert
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.