Trying to build today’s snapshot (ruby-2.2.0-r45509), and:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/vjoel/src/ruby-2.2.0-r45509/ext/pty’
compiling pty.c
In file included from ossl.h:219:0,
from ossl_pkey.c:11:
openssl_missing.h:71:6: error: conflicting types for ?HMAC_CTX_copy?
/usr/include/openssl/hmac.h:102:5: note: previous declaration of
?HMAC_CTX_copy? was here
openssl_missing.h:95:5: error: conflicting types for
?EVP_CIPHER_CTX_copy?
/usr/include/openssl/evp.h:503:5: note: previous declaration of
?EVP_CIPHER_CTX_copy? was here
openssl_missing.h:173:5: error: conflicting types for ?BN_rand_range?
/usr/include/openssl/bn.h:437:5: note: previous declaration of
?BN_rand_range? was here
openssl_missing.h:177:5: error: conflicting types for
?BN_pseudo_rand_range?
/usr/include/openssl/bn.h:438:5: note: previous declaration of
?BN_pseudo_rand_range? was here
Any suggestions how to get around this? The ssl version is 1.0.1 (on
unbuntu 12.04).
Joel VanderWerf [email protected] wrote:
Trying to build today’s snapshot (ruby-2.2.0-r45509), and:
This seems to be a bug with r45509. Reverting it helps, but there’s
still warnings from r45508.
Cc-ing ruby-core.
openssl_missing.h:173:5: error: conflicting types for ???BN_rand_range???
/usr/include/openssl/bn.h:437:5: note: previous declaration of
???BN_rand_range??? was here
openssl_missing.h:177:5: error: conflicting types for ???BN_pseudo_rand_range???
/usr/include/openssl/bn.h:438:5: note: previous declaration of
???BN_pseudo_rand_range??? was here
Any suggestions how to get around this? The ssl version is 1.0.1 (on
unbuntu 12.04).
Hopefully nobu knows. gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) here.
[1] r45508 warnings: http://yhbt.net/r45508.warnings.txt
On 04/02/2014 03:31 PM, Eric W. wrote:
Joel VanderWerf [email protected] wrote:
Trying to build today’s snapshot (ruby-2.2.0-r45509), and:
This seems to be a bug with r45509. Reverting it helps, but there’s
still warnings from r45508.
Cc-ing ruby-core.
Turns out I can build the stable snapshot (ruby 2.1.2p80 (2014-03-01
revision 45231) [x86_64-linux]), and I can reproduce my segfault with
that.
The segfault (not related to openssl, AFAIK) is why I was trying to
build the snapshot, to make sure it hadn’t been fixed since 2.1. Still
have to isolate it reliably so that it is reportable. It’s probably in
rbtree.