Hi all - this is for the Smalltalkers and the people interested in
Ruby’s genealogy, as it were. Is it fair for me to tell people that
method_missing is a Ruby translation of Smalltalk’s doesNotUnderstand?
Or is it more a totally unique feature? I was going to say the first,
but now I think it’s the latter. I don’t think you can rewrite
doesNotUnderstand the way you can rewrite method_missing - or,
actually, I think you can, but I think in practice it happens much
less. Anyway, help me out if you know the answer to this one.