For as much flack as Ruby takes for having constants which can be
changed, I was amused to find this aritcle:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9033-another-fundamental-constant-accused-of-changing.html
posted at slashdot. The headline is: Another fundamental constant
accused of changing
Maybe Ruby’s got the right approach after all, huh?
–
thanks,
-pate