Is there in the Ruby community anything like “ruby coding convention”?
Google returns two interesting links:
http://pub.cozmixng.org/~the-rwiki/rw-cgi.rb?cmd=view;name=RubyCodingConvention
Are they “authoritative” for some meaning of the word? 
Many thanks in advance,
Cheers.
On 1/21/07, Stefano Z. [email protected] wrote:
–
Stefano Z. -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema / right keys at the right time
There is no official/authoritative Style Sheet/Coding Conventions but
those two put together are what most of the community uses
Hi –
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Chris C. wrote:
There is no official/authoritative Style Sheet/Coding Conventions but
those two put together are what most of the community uses
I’d also point to the standard library (at least most of it
as a
good source of examples of traditional Ruby style.
David
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:33:31AM +0900, [email protected] wrote:
I’d also point to the standard library (at least most of it
as a
good source of examples of traditional Ruby style.
That’s indeed what I usually do, but a visible document on the net would
be far more reassuring for newbies willing to following the community
best-practices 
Hi –
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Stefano Z. wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:33:31AM +0900, [email protected] wrote:
I’d also point to the standard library (at least most of it
as a
good source of examples of traditional Ruby style.
That’s indeed what I usually do, but a visible document on the net would
be far more reassuring for newbies willing to following the community
best-practices 
Like I said, “also” 
David
Chris C. wrote:
There is no official/authoritative Style Sheet/Coding Conventions but
those two put together are what most of the community uses
There is also style guide on the RubyGarden wiki
(http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby) , but the wiki doesn’t seem to be
responding right now.
–
James B.
“Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally
for machines to execute.”
- H. Abelson and G. Sussman
(in "The Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs)