Ruby 1.9.1 is released

Ruby
41

Domo arigato

by
TheR

42

This is great - nice work by the ruby team!

In updating one of my gems for 1.9 compatability, I came across this
behaviour (which I don’t believe I’ve seen noted in the other changes
lists), and just wanted to find out if it is expected:

$ irb

a = *[1]; p a
=> 1

$ irb1.9

a = *[1]; p a
=> [1]

Regards,

Charles

43

You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
Porting Libraries to Win32.

http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but
my
browsers won’t connect. Is anyone else having that problem?

-jayce

From: “Luis L.” [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:10 AM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: “ruby-talk ML” [email protected]
Subject: Re: Win32 Binary errors

44

Hi,

Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner wrote:

Jayce M. wrote:

You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
Porting Libraries to Win32.

http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but
my
browsers won’t connect. Is anyone else having that problem?

I also cannot reach this. Trying to “ping” (61.197.191.146) leads to
lost packages.

The hard disk was crashed two days ago.
Wait patiently.

45

Jayce M. wrote:

You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
Porting Libraries to Win32.

http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but
my
browsers won’t connect. Is anyone else having that problem?

I also cannot reach this. Trying to “ping” (61.197.191.146) leads to
lost packages.

Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner

46

hi list,
we are currently preparing Ruby 1.9.1-p0 and 1.8.7-p72 binary packages
for Mac OSX (Leopard, Tiger, Panther and below also supported). I’ll
keep you all posted when the final packages are ready.
Project page: http://rubyosx.com

regards,
matthias

47

In article
[email protected],
Gregory B. [email protected] wrote:

A huge thanks to all of ruby-core for this, and for your hard work on
release management, Yugui.

Kudos to the team!

Is there a possibility that Ruby 1.8.8 will go back to being similar
to 1.8.6 and remove the 1.9 compatibility shims?
This would make maintaining old 1.8 code much easier.

I second that.

48

2009/2/1 WATANABE Hirofumi [email protected]:

I also cannot reach this. Trying to “ping” (61.197.191.146) leads to
lost packages.

The hard disk was crashed two days ago.
Wait patiently.

–
eban

For the time being, you can download the required dll files at
http://121.78.227.9/ruby-dll/

Regards,

Park H.

49

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Yugui (Yuki S.) [email protected]
wrote:

series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.

SIZE: 9025004 bytes

iEYEARECAAYFAkmDLZ4ACgkQOXzH5JLb/AWYWgCcC2PXYjaV2tCFrO+LFQoObhrM
UmIAn0EXvi2E6+aIa+9KCdhKSie+2tcL
=fAek
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hi,
I’m a kind of confused. It seem as this is the first production
release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable
distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows
1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.
Do I need to wait for a final production release (somethin new for me)
or it is www.ruby-lang.org update issue.

Thanks,
Ubaldo

50

I want to thank all ruby team for this great work.
If i can say it, i’d like to have an installer for windows as it was for
the old 1.8.6

51

On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Ubaldo V. wrote:

It seem as this is the first production
release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable
distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows
1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.

Sorry. I have updated the link now.

James Edward G. II

52

Hello. Everyone!