[Ruby 1.8 - Backport #1915] const defined?の1.9との挙動の違いについて

Issue #1915 has been updated by Stefan Radomski.

Hello,

i have found that behavior in rubinius too. I fixed it, so that it
worked like ruby 1.9, but broke the compatibility with 1.8.
Will this be fixed in the next version of 1.8?

Backport #1915: const_defined?の1.9との挙動の違いについて
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/1915

Author: Akira M.
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Akinori MUSHA
Category:
Target version:

=begin
以下の場合に
% cat const_defined.rb
class Alpha
class Beta; end
end

class Gamma < Alpha; end

puts Gamma::const_get(‘Alpha’)

puts Gamma::const_defined?(‘Alpha’)

1.8と1.9ではそれぞれこうなります。
% ruby18 -v
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i686-darwin9]
% ruby18 const_defined.rb
Alpha
false
% ruby19 -v
ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i386-darwin9.7.0]
% ruby19 const_defined.rb
Alpha
true

1.9から仕様が変更されたということなのかな、と思うのですが、これは1.8.xにバックポートされる予定はあるのでしょうか?
=end

Hi,

In message “Re: [ruby-dev:43518] [Ruby 1.8 - Backport #1915]
const_defined?$B$N(B1.9$B$H$N5sF0$N0c$$$K$D$$$F(B”
on Wed, 11 May 2011 16:27:10 +0900, Stefan Radomski
[email protected] writes:

|i have found that behavior in rubinius too. I fixed it, so that it worked like
ruby 1.9, but broke the compatibility with 1.8.
|Will this be fixed in the next version of 1.8?

I am afraid there will be no “next version of 1.8”. 1.8.7 will be
maintained but there will be no room for incompatible changes.

          matz.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs