So has the name ‘Rite’ for Ruby 2.0 officially gone the way of the
Dodo bird?
I’m curious to know b/c I have a little web generation tool that I
think the name ‘rite’ would suite (b/c of the alliteration to
‘write’). But I’m not sure if I should b/c of the whole Ruby 2.0
thing.
I think that ‘rite’ is a name for technologies that are not yet ready,
but still developing.
I thought the dodo arrives with 2.0, which would be about Dec at the
earliest, or its ready when it is ready.
I could be very wrong, and am not an expert in naming.
In message “Re: ‘Rite’”
on Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:01:49 +0900, Trans [email protected]
writes:
|So has the name ‘Rite’ for Ruby 2.0 officially gone the way of the
|Dodo bird?
Rite is a code name for my next implementation. Since YARV came in,
the development of Rite itself is suspended.
|I’m curious to know b/c I have a little web generation tool that I
|think the name ‘rite’ would suite (b/c of the alliteration to
|‘write’). But I’m not sure if I should b/c of the whole Ruby 2.0
|thing.
I have no trademark registration or such, so I don’t think I can claim
anything on the word Rite. But I am afraid it might cause confusion
in the Ruby world to use that word for a project.
So has the name ‘Rite’ for Ruby 2.0 officially gone the way of the
Dodo bird?
I’m curious to know b/c I have a little web generation tool that I
think the name ‘rite’ would suite (b/c of the alliteration to
‘write’). But I’m not sure if I should b/c of the whole Ruby 2.0
thing.
There’s always webrite
martin
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.