Hello,
How would you correct this “bug” in ri ?
~> ri Object#tap
More than one method matched your request. You can refine
your search by asking for information on one of:
Object#tap, Object#tap
There seem to be no difference between the two proposed strings so I
have no way to access either one of them.
Cheers,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:32, Jean-Julien F.
[email protected] wrote:
Hello,
How would you correct this “bug” in ri ?
~> ri Object#tap
More than one method matched your request. You can refine
your search by asking for information on one of:
Object#tap, Object#tap
Trunk is ok. I’ve tested it here and it doesn’t show that bug.
Could you send the ruby version you’re using, so that this can be
tracked?
$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.3dev (2010-07-21 trunk 28695) [x86_64-linux]
$
Hello,
Could you send the ruby version you’re using, so that this can be tracked?
$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.3dev (2010-07-21 trunk 28695) [x86_64-linux]
Sure:
~>ruby -v
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [universal-darwin10.0]
Could it be some installed gem that override the Object#tap method and
confuse ri ?
Thanks,
On Jul 25, 2010, at 08:02 , Jean-Julien F. wrote:
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [universal-darwin10.0]
Could it be some installed gem that override the Object#tap method and
confuse ri ?
you have 2 installs of the rdoc/ri info. Do this:
% locate cdesc-Array.yaml | grep system