I placed a Ruby script in the site_ruby directory, expecting to find it
from other ruby scripts using the “require” keyword but, to my surprise,
it
does nothing.
Do I have no idea how “require” works? How does “require” find
files to
load?
Thank you…
lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/file_I_want_to_load.rb
“Just Another Victim of the Ambient M.” [email protected]
wrote
in message news:[email protected]…
I placed a Ruby script in the site_ruby directory, expecting to find it
from other ruby scripts using the “require” keyword but, to my surprise,
it does nothing.
Do I have no idea how “require” works? How does “require” find files
to load?
Thank you…
Okay, it's failling specifically for mechanize. If I make another
ruby
script, that works properly. So, what’s with mechanize?
Thank you…
“Just Another Victim of the Ambient M.” [email protected]
wrote
in message news:[email protected]…
Okay, it’s failling specifically for mechanize. If I make another ruby
script, that works properly. So, what’s with mechanize?
Thank you…
...and "require 'rubygems'" doesn't help...
Thanks...
“Just Another Victim of the Ambient M.” [email protected]
wrote
in message news:[email protected]…
to load?
Thank you…Okay, it’s failling specifically for mechanize. If I make another
ruby script, that works properly. So, what’s with mechanize?
Thank you……and “require ‘rubygems’” doesn’t help…
Thanks…
...and I'm using Ruby 1.8.4...
Thanks...
“Just Another Victim of the Ambient M.” [email protected]
wrote
in message news:[email protected]…
“Just Another Victim of the Ambient M.” [email protected]
Thank you…Aliasing functions to get rid of warnings. Remove when support for
‘each_recursive.’ What’s up with that? Do I have any reasonable
expectation of this working, now? Why the hell did I have to do all this?
Why can’t this “just work?”
Thank you…
Okay, after _way_ too many code modifications, I got it to almost
work…
One way that it is defective is that it can’t always parse the links
of
a page. The strange thing is that it works find for some pages (like
slashdot.org) but completely fails for others (like rubyforge.org).
When it
fails, it does so by failing to collect the URL of the link and the
script
dies by sending a message to a nil object. I looked at the source and
the
two pages seem to be the same to me. Can anyone guess what’s going on?
Also, why didn’t “mechanize” “just work?”
Thank you…
“Just Another Victim of the Ambient M.” [email protected]
wrote
in message news:[email protected]…
it from other ruby scripts using the “require” keyword but, to my
Thanks……and I’m using Ruby 1.8.4…
Thanks…
Okay, so if I go into mechanize.rb and make this change to a line of
code:
#require ‘web/htmltools/xmltree’ # narf
require ‘xmltree’
...and go into mechanize\parsing.rb and comment out this block of
code:
1.8.2
if RUBY_VERSION > “1.8.2”
alias :old_each_recursive :each_recursive
alias :old_find_first_recursive :find_first_recursive
alias :old_index_in_parent :index_in_parent
end
...it all parses. Otherwise, I get an undefined method error for
‘each_recursive.’ What’s up with that? Do I have any reasonable
expectation of this working, now? Why the hell did I have to do all
this?
Why can’t this “just work?”
Thank you…
Just Another Victim of the Ambient M. wrote:
> Okay, after _way_ too many code modifications, I got it to almost > work... > One way that it is defective is that it can't always parse the links of > a page. The strange thing is that it works find for some pages (like > slashdot.org) but completely fails for others (like rubyforge.org). When it > fails, it does so by failing to collect the URL of the link and the script > dies by sending a message to a nil object. I looked at the source and the > two pages seem to be the same to me. Can anyone guess what's going on? > Also, why didn't "mechanize" "just work?" > Thank you..wrote in message news:[email protected]…
“Just Another Victim of the Ambient M.” [email protected]
wrote in message news:[email protected]…
It sounds like you didn’t install this in any normal fashion? I have yet
to run into public Ruby libraries which require you to copy them into
the Ruby directory. Plus, I know Mechanize is available as a gem.
Why are you copying it manually? I would suspect this as the root of the
issue, although it’s hard to tell.
-Justin
Just Another Victim of the Ambient M. wrote:
it is packaged, then it is horribly broken. I mean, really, what does the
gem do that’s so different and what necessitates this difference?
It may be broken.
What was in the zip file? Was there a setup.rb and if so, did you
run it?
There may be some config involved other than just copying files over.
That’s usually the case, esp. if there are many files in the package.
Gems are smart enough to know what’s necessary to install themselves
(e.g. invoke setup.rb properly). And installing a gem is usually as
easy as: gem install foobar (assuming you’ve got permissions, etc.)
Gems are there to make things easier, not harder. Usually they
succeed.
Hal
“Justin C.” [email protected] wrote in message
news:[email protected]…
“Just Another Victim of the Ambient M.” [email protected]
One way that it is defective is that it can’t always parse the links
to run into public Ruby libraries which require you to copy them into the
Ruby directory. Plus, I know Mechanize is available as a gem.
Why are you copying it manually? I would suspect this as the root of the
issue, although it’s hard to tell.
I appreciate that it's hard to tell.
I don't really know what gems are and I generally try to avoid
things I
don’t understand.
If you go to the sourceforge download site:
http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=1453&release_id=6508
You'll see that it comes in a .zip file with all the files in it.
Now,
pehaps this opinion is naive of me but if the package doesn’t simply
work as
it is packaged, then it is horribly broken. I mean, really, what does
the
gem do that’s so different and what necessitates this difference?
“Hal F.” [email protected] wrote in message
news:[email protected]…
Now, pehaps this opinion is naive of me but if the package doesn’t simply
work as it is packaged, then it is horribly broken. I mean, really, what
does the gem do that’s so different and what necessitates this
difference?It may be broken.
What was in the zip file? Was there a setup.rb and if so, did you
run it?
Well, if you follow the link, you can see for yourself!
There was no setup.rb or anything, although I've seen that before.
There was basically just two directories. One had mechanize and all it
needed (except for htmltools, which I had to go get, myself) and the
other
hosted a rather large test application. At least, I assume it was a
test
program since it was in a directory called “test.”
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs