I am having trouble with the recent version of the Reorder extension.
The one that uses the 4 icons via shards. The old, drag-and-drop
version was working fine. Has anyone else noted this as an issue?
When I try to move a page, it has unpredictable results. They don’t
seem to properly relocate.
Mario T. Lanza wrote:
When I try to move a page, it has unpredictable results. They don’t
seem to properly relocate.
I encountered the same phenomenon before, having data incorrect.
“position” has to be unique in a certain “parent_id”.
If you get no empty result executing following SQL(when you use MySQL),
you should modify “position” data first.
select * from pages
group by parent_id,position having count(*) > 1;
Hi Naohiro,
Actually, I preferred the former reorder extension with the drag and
drop interface. I modified it to work with the shards extension.
Mario
Ideally, when you run the included migration, it should put all pages in
a default order based on the title. Unfortunately, there are serious
weaknesses to acts_as_list that cause it to break when any records get
inserted inconsistently. I’d appreciate any tests/patches that could
identify and resolve this issue.
Sean
I am not sure if I am stepping on anyone’s toes, but I got the old
drag and drop version to work on 0.6.4 with shards. This way it plays
nice with others, especially the copy_move extension.
Once I clean up the rake task, I can post a svn link if anyone is
interested.
Keith
Keith,
I would be. Again, no offense to anyone, but I kinda liked the
original one better anyways.
Thanks man,
–
Travis B.
Not sent from my iPhone.
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 18:17 +0100, Keith B. wrote:
Once I clean up the rake task, I can post a svn link if anyone is
interested.
I would be interested. I’m in the process of setting up my first Radiant
system for end users who are not interested in learning how computer
things work, so the smoother the interface the better!
Thanks!
Bill B.
Keith,
I’m sure the community would appreciate it. In retrospect, my decision
to overwrite the old one was a bit too tyrannical. At the time I was
under the impression that 1) not many people were using it (which was
not the case), and 2) it was not being maintained (which was the case).
Cheers,
Sean
On Jan 16, 2008 6:17 PM, Keith B. [email protected] wrote:
I am not sure if I am stepping on anyone’s toes, but I got the old
drag and drop version to work on 0.6.4 with shards. This way it plays
nice with others, especially the copy_move extension.
Once I clean up the rake task, I can post a svn link if anyone is
interested.
Keith, did I miss the svn link or have you yet to post it?
–
Sincerely,
Bjorn Michelsen
On Jan 17, 2008 3:31 AM, Mario T. Lanza [email protected] wrote:
Keith B. wrote:
I am not sure if I am stepping on anyone’s toes, but I got the old
drag and drop version to work on 0.6.4 with shards. This way it plays
nice with others, especially the copy_move extension.
Once I clean up the rake task, I can post a svn link if anyone is
interested.
Me too. I attached it in the prior reply if anyone needs it.
Looks like the attachment elf snatched it. I didn’t get any attachment,
at
least.
Would you mind posting a link instead, please?
–
Sincerely,
Bjorn Michelsen
Keith B. wrote:
I am not sure if I am stepping on anyone’s toes, but I got the old
drag and drop version to work on 0.6.4 with shards. This way it plays
nice with others, especially the copy_move extension.
Once I clean up the rake task, I can post a svn link if anyone is
interested.
Keith
Me too. I attached it in the prior reply if anyone needs it.
Would you mind posting a link instead, please?
No problem.
http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/1309/reorder.zip
David P. wrote:
Mario T. Lanza wrote:
Would you mind posting a link instead, please?
No problem.
http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/1309/reorder.zip
Thanks for posting this!
Mario, are you planning on implementing reorder for 0.6.7 using the old
DnD functionality?