Relational DB - Related and not Related

Hi

I’m working on a project that has users and groups, users can be members
of
a group or they can just be a user - what’s going to be the best way
to
deal with this?
I understand the normal has_many relationship just not sure how to do
this
one. Will try to post some code snippets tomorrow.

Thanks, Cameron

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Cameron G. [email protected]
wrote:

users can be members of a group or they can just be a
user - what’s going to be the best way to deal with this?

has_many :through seems perfect for this, given the many-to-many
nature and the possibility you’ll want to have additional info about
the relationship (like when they joined, positions held within the
group, etc.).

-Dave


Dave A., the T. Rex of Codosaurus LLC,
secret-cleared freelance software developer
taking contracts in or near NoVa or remote.
See information at http://www.Codosaur.us/.

On 24 June 2013 13:54, Cameron G. [email protected] wrote:

Hi

I’m working on a project that has users and groups, users can be members of
a group or they can just be a user - what’s going to be the best way to deal
with this?

If the user can only be a member of one group then use User belongs_to
group. If a particular member does not belong to a group then just
leave group_id nil. You will obviously have to allow for user.group
== nil in the code where appropriate. If he can belong to many (or
no) groups then use has_many :through as Dave suggested. You can test
user.groups to see if he is in any groups.

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Colin L. [email protected]
wrote:

If the user can only be a member of one group then use User belongs_to
group.

Oh, good point. I was assuming (and you know what happens then!) that
a User could belong to many Groups.

-Dave


Dave A., the T. Rex of Codosaurus LLC,
secret-cleared freelance software developer
taking contracts in or near NoVa or remote.
See information at http://www.Codosaur.us/.

Thanks Dave & Colin! That was how I had hoped it would work!

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Cameron G. [email protected]
wrote:

:unprocessable_entity }
end

This will do (or at least try) the save twice, if the user has a
group. I’d recommend:

if it saves
redirect to (if it has a group, the group, else /)
else
give error msg
end

Also, look closely at the way you’re checking for a group. The first
option will trigger if the group is nil, the second if it’s not “”
(empty string)… but what if it is “”? That’s neither nil nor
not-“”, so it will take the “else” path and pretend like it didn’t
save. I suggest you use .blank? (or its inverse, .present?) to tell
if it’s there or not. Both nil and “” count as blank (and not
present).

-Dave


Dave A., the T. Rex of Codosaurus LLC,
secret-cleared freelance software developer
taking contracts in or near NoVa or remote.
See information at http://www.Codosaur.us/.

On 26 June 2013 02:55, Cameron G. [email protected] wrote:

Here is an update, I have it working as only a group or as only a non-group
user. I have below the create controller and was wondering what would be the
best way to allow associations and non-associated records. Thanks

def create
if Group.nil?

Can you explain what the above line is for?

Colin

Here is an update, I have it working as only a group or as only a
non-group
user. I have below the create controller and was wondering what would be
the best way to allow associations and non-associated records. Thanks

def create
if Group.nil?
@group = Group.find(params[:group_id])
@user = @group.users.create(params[:user])
else
@user = User.new
@user.ip_address = request.remote_ip
@user.ua_string = request.user_agent
@user = User.new(params[:user])
end

respond_to do |format|
  if @user.save && @user.group_id == nil
    format.html { redirect_to "/", notice: 'Thank you for 

registering!’
}
elsif @user.save && @user.group_id != “”
format.html { redirect_to group_path(@group.token), notice:
‘Thank
you for registering!’ }
else
format.html { render action: “new” }
format.json { render json: @user.errors, status:
:unprocessable_entity }
end
end
end