How can this occur?
This is output from an RSpec test…
expected: /<(?<tag>([[:alpha:]])+)>(?<cdata>(.)*)<\/\k<tag>>/
got:
/<(?([[:alpha:]])+)>(?(.)*)</\k>/
(using ==)
Any clue what I’m missing here?
Thanks,
Hal
On Sep 24, 2013, at 11:26 , Hal F. [email protected] wrote:
How can this occur?
This is output from an RSpec test…
expected: /<(?<tag>([[:alpha:]])+)>(?<cdata>(.)*)<\/\k<tag>>/ got: /<(?<tag>([[:alpha:]])+)>(?<cdata>(.)*)<\/\k<tag>>/ (using ==)
check the encodings
This is why minitest says the following:
"No visible difference in the #{klass}#inspect
output.\n",
"You should look at the implementation of #== on
",
“#{klass} or its members.\n”,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Hal F. [email protected]
wrote:
How can this occur?
This is output from an RSpec test…
expected: /<(?<tag>([[:alpha:]])+)>(?<cdata>(.)*)<\/\k<tag>>/ got: /<(?<tag>([[:alpha:]])+)>(?<cdata>(.)*)<\/\k<tag>>/(using ==)
Gives a good clue == vs #to_s/#inspect (visual inspection) may produce
different results. So you probably want to use #to_s or #inspect and
then
test the strings.
John