What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
Jamal
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
Jamal
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal M. wrote:
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
–
Eric H. - [email protected] - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
There is YARV I think that makes bytecode and there is JRuby which at
some point may create bytecode (Java), there is a a .NET project to
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Eric H. wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jamal M. wrote:
What is the current time line for Ruby 2.0 and the byte code compiler?
There are no plans for a byte code compiler.
–
Eric H. - [email protected] - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris L. wrote:
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled
ruby files), no.
PS: Don’t top post.
–
Eric H. - [email protected] - http://blog.segment7.net
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
? Derek Milhous Zumsteg
I think by bytecode compiler he means something that compiles (ie.
makes) bytecode. Its just mis-worded slightly… He said ruby 2 and that
is supposed to support bytecode, were on 1.9 now, so not long to go
Eric H. wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Kris L. wrote:
allow ruby to compiled to bytecode.
I think YARV is the Ruby 2 VM you are refering to.
Byte code interpreter, yes, compiler (something that outputs compiled
ruby files), no.PS: Don’t top post.
–
Eric H. - [email protected] - http://blog.segment7.netA: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
� Derek Milhous Zumsteg
On May 23, 2006, at 12:41 AM, Kris L. wrote:
PS: Don’t top post.
I think by bytecode compiler he means something that compiles (ie.
makes) bytecode. Its just mis-worded slightly… He said ruby 2 and
that
is supposed to support bytecode, were on 1.9 now, so not long to go
$ ruby-yarv -v
ruby 2.0.0 (Base: Ruby 1.9.0 2006-04-08) [powerpc-darwin8.6.0]
YARVCore 0.4.0 Rev: 497 (2006-05-07) [opts: ]
PS: Don’t top post, no, really.
–
Eric H. - [email protected] - http://blog.segment7.net
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
? Derek Milhous Zumsteg
On May 22, 2006, at 15:25, Eric H. wrote:
PS: Don’t top post.
And I was all ready to ask “What’s top posting?” but happily finished
reading the message…
A: Yes
Q: Is top-posting bad?
? Derek Milhous Zumsteg
What an incredibly elegant example. I love it. Although I personally
will not adopt the jargon, but will still admonish others merely to not
post the answer to somebody’s question before posting the quoted
question. Mostly 'cause I probably won’t remember the term next time I
need it.
And yes, this is a 97% content-free posting, but I just couldn’t resist
jumping up and down, pointing at the example, and going “ook! ook!”
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs