Re: Regarding IronRuby... How true it sounds from this blog

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:50:48 -0600, M. David P. <
[email protected]> wrote:

So while Charlie is correct: The IronRuby
project needs to become more community oriented, that community
orientation needs to come from not only MSFT’s direction, but the
communities direction as well.

Very well stated. And Wayne’s list certainly helps in giving a better
understanding of what is left. Such a status sent weekly (at a minimum)
could certainly help keep everyone up-to-date. Also, nothing prevents
anyone
from starting their own git or mercurial branch. If the community wants
to
actively work by that method, by all means we should. That could
potentially
even help with the community aspect. The only thing holding anyone back
is a
desire to stay completely on the same page (a la subversion and
rubyforge).
Better and more frequent communication would better serve the community
in
this case.

The problem with trying to branch IronRuby like that is the DLR is
likely to change from underneath it. Not that the idea hasn’t
occurred to me before, but it’s really not a viable option in this
scenario.

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Ryan R.
[email protected] wrote:

could certainly help keep everyone up-to-date. Also, nothing prevents anyone
http://www.panesofglass.org/


Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core


Michael L.
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs