Re: Questions for a white paper involving a demo install ofT

Wow, that was fast. Thanks for the replies.

My intention was originally to disable caching because I thought the
issue of how fast it could serve cached content wasn’t as interesting as
how fast it could do uncached content. I’d include a warning in the
text that actual implementations would be considerably faster due to the
presence of the cache, and possibly use memcached after the last run to
give comparison numbers.

I was going to run using 2.6.0_with-rails, since the folks I’m writing
for really get queasy around anything with a whiff of “beta” around it.
Deactivating the sidebars shouldn’t be that much of a problem.

Thanks again,
Sam

2.6.0? eek, that’s ooooold. It’s also using Rails 1.0 - 1.1 would
probably be a lot more relevant for you.

Kevin B. wrote:

2.6.0? eek, that’s ooooold.

9 days old, to be precise, according to
http://rubyforge.org/projects/typo/

It’s also the most recent release. If the developers didn’t want people
using code that old, they’d make a newer release, wouldn’t they? :slight_smile:

mathew

On Apr 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, mathew wrote:

Kevin B. wrote:

2.6.0? eek, that’s ooooold.

9 days old, to be precise, according to http://rubyforge.org/
projects/typo/

Well, uh, that’s an interesting timestamp there. 2.6.0 has been out
for ages.

It’s also the most recent release. If the developers didn’t want
people
using code that old, they’d make a newer release, wouldn’t they? :slight_smile:

Speaking as a developer, I really want to get 4.0 out the door.
Current trunk is perfectly usable, we just haven’t finished quite
everything we want in 4.0.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs