Dave B. [mailto:[email protected]] :
James Edward G. II wrote:
> Good points all around. Dave knows this code better than I do,
Thanks, but credit to you – IIRC part of your stated aim for
was to make it short, legible, and therefore maintainable,
and if I can
pick up this stuff in literally one minute of looking at the code,
you’ve succeeded. Well done.
Dave and James, you’ve done a great work on csv parsing. I really do not
mind if you provide a second/another version of fastercsv. maybe name
it fastercsv2 or lenientcsv, i do not care, as long as it does the job.
in this case, speed comes last (and ignored) once a problem is solved.
thanks for csv and kind regards -botp