Eric H. wrote:
On Mar 9, 2009, at 16:26, Iñaki Baz C. wrote:
Is it possible RDoc not to order the methods by name?
It isn’t possible
You can group methods by section, but currently Darkfish ignores
sections. A future release will correct this.
As a kinda- feature request, I re-open the same class in
various different subsystems, where the subsystems provide
aspects of the system that can be either required or omitted.
Perhaps a better solution would be to do that with an include,
but anyhow… I’d like to be able to separate the features of
class X that belong to each aspect… is that what sections
are for? If not, I think it’d be nice if that was somehow
With this, I’d like to see the classname and description,
then a set of aspect/section names, each with a summary
listing of the method names - each method name to jump into
a (possibly global-sorted?) list of method descriptions.
Thoughts? Would anyone else use a feature like this?
A similar feature would allow, for example, to have Array
documentation include links to the Enumerable methods it
includes. Helpful for someone wanting to learn what an Array