In beta4 I could do this:
resources :sections do
get :new, :on=>:member
end
But not with RC
If I change “new” to be something else, I can do that
So it seems that “new” is now treated like a reserved word of sorts?
I really need to share the new method between “sections/new” and
“sections/1/new” because my structure is a tree, so it makes sense to
re-use
Anyone know anything about this?
cheers!
Really hoping this is a bug not a new policy
I can see why “new” might want to be a reserved word in some way
But in this case, I really do need rails to map the “new” path so it
allows creating sub member items
EG:
/section/1/new/
is so much cleaner compared to
/section/new/?parent=1
Is there a way I can lodge a ticket?
Is rails talk not the best spot to ask questions these days?
On 2 August 2010 08:44, [email protected] [email protected]
wrote:
Is rails talk not the best spot to ask questions these days?
You post what is a quite obscure edge question on a Sunday afternoon,
and get stressed that it’s not answered by Monday morning?
Looking at your question, it might be better placed on the
rails-core forum, as that’s where the core development issues are
dealt with - and they’ll point you at how to log a ticket if that’s
the best course of action for you.