Content preview: Hi, I’ve a Rakefile generated by jeweler. It uses rcov
default
but that doesn’t properly work with 1.9 (I’m using 1.9.2), so I’d
like to
enable simplecov for my tests. I’ve used simplecov successfully
without a
Rakefile. […]
Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1
cv=JvXQbuMnWGQeb488dJ7w43Du7THgE+O7ieb9U20/rjk= c=1 sm=0
a=aofHTkXiRO8A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10
a=jQiSh5ylwdJ48oZKAz8A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Lines: 33
List-Id: ruby-talk.ruby-lang.org
List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]
List-Post: mailto:[email protected]
List-Owner: mailto:[email protected]
List-Help: mailto:[email protected]?body=help
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe
Received-SPF: none (Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework)
SPF=FROM;
[email protected];
remoteip=::ffff:221.186.184.68;
remotehost=carbon.ruby-lang.org;
helo=carbon.ruby-lang.org;
receiver=eq4.andreas-s.net;
Hi,
I’ve a Rakefile generated by jeweler. It uses rcov default but that
doesn’t properly work with 1.9 (I’m using 1.9.2), so I’d like to enable
simplecov for my tests. I’ve used simplecov successfully without a
Rakefile.
I added
gem “simplecov”, “>= 0.4.0”
to Gemfile and modified the test task:
require ‘rake/testtask’
require ‘simplecov’
Rake::TestTask.new(:test) do |test|
SimpleCov.start do
add_filter ‘test_’
end
test.libs << ‘lib’ << ‘test’
test.pattern = ‘test/**/test_*.rb’
test.verbose = true
end
simplecov is executed, but doesn’t record anything:
Coverage report generated for rake to coverage. 0 / 0 LOC (0.0%)
covered.
As far as I can see, simplecov doesn’t provide a ready rake task, how
can I use it in this case? I’ve gone through the rake documentation but
didn’t spot anything obvious I’m missing.
thanks,
- Markus