Is there a list for discussing Rails internals or is that kind of one
of those jealously guarded secret things?
Also, I seem to be being a bit of a prat today, but if you read this
closely:
Bit of a grammatical error there. (Sorry!)
Giles
Giles B. wrote :
| Is there a list for discussing Rails internals or is that kind of one
| of those jealously guarded secret things?
Well, I would say that even if no one wants to talk about internals with
you, you can at least resort to reading the sources 
Otherwise there are some interesting discussion on rails-core.
–
Frederick R. aka Sleeper – [email protected]
“MSDOS didn’t get as bad as it is overnight – it took over ten years
of careful development.”
(By [email protected])
merci beaucoup mon ami! (or words to that effect.)
On 3/6/06, Frederick R. [email protected] wrote:
Frederick R. aka Sleeper – [email protected]
–
Giles Goat Boy
http://gilesmakesmusic.blogspot.com
http://gileswritescode.blogspot.com
Giles B. wrote :
| merci beaucoup mon ami! (or words to that effect.)
Your french is perfect
–
Frederick R. aka Sleeper – [email protected]
"On a normal ascii line, the only safe condition to detect is a ‘BREAK’
- everything else having been assigned functions by Gnu EMACS."
(By Tarl Neustaedter)
Giles B. wrote:
Is there a list for discussing Rails internals or is that kind of one
of those jealously guarded secret things?Also, I seem to be being a bit of a prat today, but if you read this
closely:Bit of a grammatical error there. (Sorry!)
Giles
Giles,
I’m a newbie to Rails too, and I’m interested in a more thorough look at
the rails internals as well (mainly because I think ActiveRecord imposes
undue burdens on my database schema, but ActiveController is pretty
cool). If you’d like to collaborate, drop me an email.