Quality of Ruby

I was reading this interesting post [1] about Ruby, and well…, you
rather read it.

[1] http://www.zedshaw.com/rants/the_big_ruby_vulnerabilities.html

Kless [email protected] writes:

I was reading this interesting post [1] about Ruby, and well…, you
rather read it.

[1] http://www.zedshaw.com/rants/the_big_ruby_vulnerabilities.html

  1. consider the source
  2. upgrade your Ruby

Having said that. Is there a particular concern you stil have?

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Kless [email protected] wrote:

I was reading this interesting post [1] about Ruby, and well…, you
rather read it.

[1] http://www.zedshaw.com/rants/the_big_ruby_vulnerabilities.html

Well, I guess some people like to bitch, and some people like to fix
;^)

Todd

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Brian A. [email protected]
wrote:

Kless [email protected] writes:

I was reading this interesting post [1] about Ruby, and well…, you
rather read it.

[1] http://www.zedshaw.com/rants/the_big_ruby_vulnerabilities.html

  1. consider the source
    He’s asking if he is funny, well at that exact moment he is. But never
    beat a man on the ground :frowning:
  2. upgrade your Ruby
    for sure.
    R.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs