Hi,
I’m trying to use annotate to document my model classes. Two of the
models
don’t work, though, with the following errors:
$ bundle exec annotate --position before
Unable to annotate acceptance_criterion_results.rb: #<NoMethodError:
undefined method `assert_valid_keys’ for :acceptance_criterion:Symbol>
Unable to annotate test.rb: #<TypeError: can’t convert Symbol into
Integer>
Annotated (4): AcceptanceCriterion, Invoice, OutdataInvoice,
TestExecution
There’s nothing special about either of the models. Any help is
appreciated.
I am using Ruby 1.9.3-p0 and annotate 2.4.1.beta1 (2.4.0 crashed before
annotating anything).
Thanks,
Cassiano
Can you post your model code in a gist?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Cassiano L. [email protected]
wrote:
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G.
“Ruby on Rails: Talk” group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
–
Greg A.
http://twitter.com/akinsgre
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Colin L. [email protected]
wrote:
On 16 February 2012 12:45, Cassiano L. [email protected] wrote:
Sure, here you go:
https://gist.github.com/1844590
Will you also include the TestExecution model?
Greg A.
http://twitter.com/akinsgre
On 16 February 2012 12:45, Cassiano L. [email protected] wrote:
Sure, here you go:
https://gist.github.com/1844590
schema.rb might be useful too.
Colin
Hi,
Integer>
Thanks,
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
–
gplus.to/clanlaw
On 16 February 2012 12:45, Cassiano L. [email protected] wrote:
Sure, here you go:
https://gist.github.com/1844590
Model classes are usually singular, so the class for table
acceptance_criterion_results would be AcceptanceCriterionResult in
acceptance_criterion_result.rb
Colin
Hi,
Integer>
Thanks,
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
–
gplus.to/clanlaw
I’ve updated the gist with the other files.
Colin: I understand that, but that was a semantic decision to keep
results
in the plural. I don’t think either format should break annotate,
though…
Cassiano
On 16 February 2012 17:20, Cassiano L. [email protected] wrote:
I’ve updated the gist with the other files.
Colin: I understand that, but that was a semantic decision to keep results
in the plural. I don’t think either format should break annotate, though…
I would try it with the class singular if I were you, in order to
determine if that is part of the problem. Easy enough to hack it to
find out. I think you should just need to rename the model file and
change the class name. It may break the rest of the app but that does
not matter if just trying annotate.
By the way, I find it easier to follow the thread if replies are not
top posted but are inserted at appropriate points in the previous
email.
Colin
On 16 February 2012 10:06, Greg A. [email protected] wrote:
–
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G.
“Ruby on Rails: Talk” group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
–
gplus.to/clanlaw
On 16 February 2012 15:44, Colin L. [email protected] wrote:
find out. I think you should just need to rename the model file and
change the class name. It may break the rest of the app but that does
not matter if just trying annotate.
I just tried that following your suggestion and got the same errors.
By the way, I find it easier to follow the thread if replies are not
top posted but are inserted at appropriate points in the previous
email.
Thanks for the friendly reminder. It’s been sometime since I last
interacted in a mailing list, and these things are easy to forget, but
I’ll
do better from now on.
Cassiano