Is there a way to slow the playback of a data file through an FFT Sink?
If
I recorded at 50M and I set my FFT rate to 25M, would that result in
playback twice as long?
Thanks.
Is there a way to slow the playback of a data file through an FFT Sink?
If
I recorded at 50M and I set my FFT rate to 25M, would that result in
playback twice as long?
Thanks.
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Paul B. Huter [email protected]
wrote:
Is there a way to slow the playback of a data file through an FFT Sink? If I
recorded at 50M and I set my FFT rate to 25M, would that result in playback
twice as long?Thanks.
No, the sample rate of the FFT sink is just for display purposes: it
sets the range of the x-axis and nothing more.
If you want to slow down your display, assuming there is no hardware
in the loop, you can use a throttle block with a fairly low rate.
Tom
Sounds good, thanks.
Paul B. Huter
I often “speed up” the playback of large recordings by adjusting the
throttle only. In the throttle block, I just multiple the recorded
sample
rate by a factor (say 10) to get increased playback speed. Don’t change
any other blocks’ parameters - just the throttle.
Very Respectfully,
Dan CaJacob
Tom:
What would you recommend if my data was recorded at 50M for about 15
seconds and I would like to double to playback time with a throttle. If
I
set the throttle to 25M, would that do the trick, or is it more
complicated
than that? I’m waiting for a new shipment of RAM, and once I have that I
will be able to play around with things, but I just thought I would
query
the group to get a good starting point.
Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
yes, that would basically make a 1s recording (50e6 Samples) play in 2s.
Be aware however that 25Msam/s is still a lot to process, so the
throttled samples might still stress out your CPU
Have nice new year,
Marcus
On 26.12.2013 23:31, Paul B. Huter wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSxB+KAAoJEAFxB7BbsDrLD+cH/RX1xS7HyQzKJum70x8ewh1Q
DyYhGHxNwhFgFdGi1Al/g5K85zp/FeGbTetHh4v584e6qt23PsqwtNubuHvgiwxy
S1w+0ksbR9/eueSMs52M7Nmom7txet2Gsl3IUEeuc07vnAgm1bZfj42Zr5U8LHhV
W7RtqzM9ru7b9CEQUabcK85QBfPE4lFW0Ry7RT1R1KIse+a4ZApe/9Td3HcrVEVB
kERgwX9GhuU2BLm4O88jG8uG4wYI9Lh9Jv1s13Q72UqMW+VTt25m+lt1mkLM9bNO
frvnz9mZGcrMCB1Ojlg3Y/4WoSf75ZG17KlhWtwAt1qeHCrb/RwTMygsR0IJGOw=
=+8dq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks, Marcus. The limiting factor for the flows I have seems to be RAM
more than anything, and I will be back at 8GB tomorrow, hopefully, and
things should be good.
Thanks, and Happy New Year.
Paul B. Huter
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs