[patch] Sink floating gstreamer objects

Hi,

Attached is the first patch in my patchset intended to merge both
current
gstreamer bindings into one with the best of both :slight_smile: Please review and
let me
know if it’s ok to commit?

See the patch itself for details. It does make me wonder if
rbgobj_get_value_from_gobject shouldn’t be in rbgst.h instead of
rbgprivate.h? Because at this point it’s not possible to compile the
gstreamer bindings without having the glib2 source.

Sjoerd
PS: For those who wondering i’m using git-svn for my patch management,
which
shows up in the diff. But it doesn’t make any difference when committing
to
svn.

PS: For those who wondering i’m using git-svn for my patch management, which

Interesting. Do you have any pointer explaining the advantages of doing
so?


Guillaume C. - http://zarb.org/~gc/

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Guillaume C. wrote:

PS: For those who wondering i’m using git-svn for my patch management, which

Interesting. Do you have any pointer explaining the advantages of doing so?

See http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-svn.html for a
description of git-svn. The advantages of doing so is basically get all
advantages of using a DVCS while the main branch is still in svn. I’m
sure you
can find more then enough articles on the web describing the advantages
of a
DVCS. But what is most important for me is that i can commit patches
locally
and then after review can push them upstream without loosing meta-data

Sjoerd

Everything that can be invented has been invented.
– Charles Duell, Director of U.S. Patent Office, 1899

Sjoerd S. wrote:

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Guillaume C. wrote:

PS: For those who wondering i’m using git-svn for my patch management, which

Interesting. Do you have any pointer explaining the advantages of doing so?

See http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-svn.html for a
description of git-svn. The advantages of doing so is basically get all
advantages of using a DVCS while the main branch is still in svn. I’m
sure you
can find more then enough articles on the web describing the advantages
of a
DVCS. But what is most important for me is that i can commit patches
locally
and then after review can push them upstream without loosing meta-data

Sjoerd

Everything that can be invented has been invented.
– Charles Duell, Director of U.S. Patent Office, 1899

Hi Sjoerd,

Nice. I’m very interested. What changes are you going to make? iow: what
are the advantages of the “other” ruby gstreamer bindings?

Oh, and welcome to the cool-kid git club :slight_smile:

Hi,

In [email protected]
“[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] [patch] Sink floating gstreamer objects” on
Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:04:34 +0100,
Sjoerd S. [email protected] wrote:

See the patch itself for details. It does make me wonder if
rbgobj_get_value_from_gobject shouldn’t be in rbgst.h instead of
rbgprivate.h? Because at this point it’s not possible to compile the
gstreamer bindings without having the glib2 source.

I’ve exported the function.

#define GST_TAG_LIST_STRUCTURE_NAME “taglist”
Don’t export rbgst_object_instance2robj(). Use
rbgst-private.h. Others are OK for me.

Thanks,

kou

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 08:27:21AM +0900, Kouhei S. wrote:

#define GST_TAG_LIST_STRUCTURE_NAME “taglist”

Don’t export rbgst_object_instance2robj(). Use
rbgst-private.h. Others are OK for me.

Ok comitted with that change

Sjoerd

In 1750 Issac Newton became discouraged when he fell up a flight of
stairs.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs