Hi,
Attached is the first patch in my patchset intended to merge both
current
gstreamer bindings into one with the best of both 
Please review and
let me
know if it’s ok to commit?
See the patch itself for details. It does make me wonder if
rbgobj_get_value_from_gobject shouldn’t be in rbgst.h instead of
rbgprivate.h? Because at this point it’s not possible to compile the
gstreamer bindings without having the glib2 source.
Sjoerd
PS: For those who wondering i’m using git-svn for my patch management,
which
shows up in the diff. But it doesn’t make any difference when committing
to
svn.
PS: For those who wondering i’m using git-svn for my patch management, which
Interesting. Do you have any pointer explaining the advantages of doing
so?
–
Guillaume C. - Guillaume Cottenceau
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Guillaume C. wrote:
PS: For those who wondering i’m using git-svn for my patch management, which
Interesting. Do you have any pointer explaining the advantages of doing so?
See git-svn(1) for a
description of git-svn. The advantages of doing so is basically get all
advantages of using a DVCS while the main branch is still in svn. I’m
sure you
can find more then enough articles on the web describing the advantages
of a
DVCS. But what is most important for me is that i can commit patches
locally
and then after review can push them upstream without loosing meta-data
Sjoerd
Everything that can be invented has been invented.
– Charles Duell, Director of U.S. Patent Office, 1899
Sjoerd S. wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Guillaume C. wrote:
PS: For those who wondering i’m using git-svn for my patch management, which
Interesting. Do you have any pointer explaining the advantages of doing so?
See git-svn(1) for a
description of git-svn. The advantages of doing so is basically get all
advantages of using a DVCS while the main branch is still in svn. I’m
sure you
can find more then enough articles on the web describing the advantages
of a
DVCS. But what is most important for me is that i can commit patches
locally
and then after review can push them upstream without loosing meta-data
Sjoerd
Everything that can be invented has been invented.
– Charles Duell, Director of U.S. Patent Office, 1899
Hi Sjoerd,
Nice. I’m very interested. What changes are you going to make? iow: what
are the advantages of the “other” ruby gstreamer bindings?
Oh, and welcome to the cool-kid git club 
Hi,
In [email protected]
“[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] [patch] Sink floating gstreamer objects” on
Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:04:34 +0100,
Sjoerd S. [email protected] wrote:
See the patch itself for details. It does make me wonder if
rbgobj_get_value_from_gobject shouldn’t be in rbgst.h instead of
rbgprivate.h? Because at this point it’s not possible to compile the
gstreamer bindings without having the glib2 source.
I’ve exported the function.
#define GST_TAG_LIST_STRUCTURE_NAME “taglist”
Don’t export rbgst_object_instance2robj(). Use
rbgst-private.h. Others are OK for me.
Thanks,
kou
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 08:27:21AM +0900, Kouhei S. wrote:
#define GST_TAG_LIST_STRUCTURE_NAME “taglist”
Don’t export rbgst_object_instance2robj(). Use
rbgst-private.h. Others are OK for me.
Ok comitted with that change
Sjoerd
In 1750 Issac Newton became discouraged when he fell up a flight of
stairs.
Please review and