Hi,
See attached patch.
Sjoerd
Hi,
See attached patch.
Sjoerd
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 07:15:42PM +0100, Sjoerd S. wrote:
Hi,
See attached patch.
Original patch was broken. Fixed version attached
Sjoerd
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 07:15:42PM +0100, Sjoerd S. wrote:
Hi,
Interestingly Ruby/Gstreamer choose the other option and already uses
[] on
Gst::Bin to get specific children.
In my experience in programming with gstreamer one rarely needs to get
a
specifically named child from a bin, but quite often wants to get a
specifically named pad. That’s why i decided to use [] to get the pads
of an
element.
Obviously some choose needs to be made. Obviously i using [] to get
pads and
to not define it on Gst::Bin. Opinions?
Sjoerd
–
Torque is cheap.
Hi,
In [email protected]
“Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] [patch] Make [] an alias of get_pad” on
Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:46:45 +0100,
Sjoerd S. [email protected] wrote:
See attached patch.
Original patch was broken. Fixed version attached
It was very happy for us if you considered to follow our
coding-style.
Others are OK for me.
kou
Hi,
In [email protected]
“Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] [patch] Make [] an alias of get_pad” on
Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:57:14 +0100,
Sjoerd S. [email protected] wrote:
Obviously some choose needs to be made. Obviously i using [] to get pads and
to not define it on Gst::Bin. Opinions?
I can’t understand why you say about Gst::Bin#[]. The change
is about Gst::Element, isn’t it?
kou
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 08:56:07AM +0900, Kouhei S. wrote:
Gst::Bin to get specific children.
is about Gst::Element, isn’t it?
The problem is that with this change both Gst::Element and Gst::Bin will
have a
[] function, which both have very different semantics. And as Gst::Bin
is a
child of Gst::Element this is really not something you want. So we
should
choose one and stick with it.
I know i and some others have various bits of code around that expects
Gst::Element#[] as defined in this patch. So i’d obviously like to keep
that
and to get rid of Gst::Bin#[] to making porting a lot easier. And in
practise
it seems more convinient too
Did you hear that there’s a group of South American Indians that worship
the number zero?
Is nothing sacred?
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 09:57:14PM +0100, Sjoerd S. wrote:
pads and to not define it on Gst::Bin. Opinions?
Yes! Pads please!
Paul
–
PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: [email protected]
University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: [email protected]
Hi,
In [email protected]
“Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] [patch] Make [] an alias of get_pad” on
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:32:54 +0100,
Sjoerd S. [email protected] wrote:
Interestingly Ruby/Gstreamer choose the other option and already uses [] on
I can’t understand why you say about Gst::Bin#[]. The change
it seems more convinient too
OK. You can do.
kou
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs