Observable on Set?

Ruby
1

Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for
storage
instead of a Set? Wouldn’t a Set be faster, especially for removing
observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of
data
structures could be improved?

2

2009/6/10 James C. [email protected]

Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage
instead of a Set? Wouldn’t a Set be faster, especially for removing
observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data
structures could be improved?

Gah, I was looking at the 1.8 lib. 1.9 uses a Hash. Sorry!