Not ok iterator 80 -- ./sample/test.rb:1104

Tanaka_A · June 17, 2006, 7:43pm

sample/test.rb e$B$,e(B
2e$B$D<:GT$7$F$$$^$9$,!":G=i$N<:GT$O<!$N$b$N$G$9!#e(B

% ./ruby ./sample/test.rb
…
not ok iterator 80 – ./sample/test.rb:1104
…

e$B<h$j=P$7$F$_$k$H!"<!$N$h$&$K$J$j$^$9!#e(B

% ./ruby -ve ’
def proc_call(&b)
b.call
end
def proc_return1
proc_call{return 42}+1
end
p proc_return1()
’
ruby 1.9.0 (2006-06-17) [i686-linux]
42

e$B$3$l$,e(B 43 e$B$K$J$k$Y$-$@$He(B test.rb
e$B$K=q$$$F$"$k$N$G<:GT$7$F$$e(B
e$B$k$o$1$G$9$,!"$3$l$C$F$d$C$Q$je(B return
e$B$O$=$l$,=q$$$F$"$k%a%=%Ce(B
e$B%I$r=*N;$9$k$3$H$K$7$F!"e(B42 e$B$N$[$&$,$h$/$J$$$G$7$g$&$+e(B?

return e$B$r=q$$$?%a%=%C%I$NCf$r8+$k$@$1$Ge(B return e$B$,$I$&F0$/$+e(B
e$B$o$+$i$J$$$N$O$h$/$J$$$H;W$$$^$9!#e(B

Tanaka_A · June 19, 2006, 1:54am

e$B$^$D$b$He(B e$B$f$-$R$m$G$9e(B

In message “Re: [ruby-dev:28741] not ok iterator 80 –
./sample/test.rb:1104”
on Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:42:00 +0900, Tanaka A. [email protected]
writes:
|
|sample/test.rb e$B$,e(B 2e$B$D<:GT$7$F$$$^$9$,!“:G=i$N<:GT$O<!$N$b$N$G$9!#e(B
|
|% ./ruby ./sample/test.rb
|…
|not ok iterator 80 – ./sample/test.rb:1104
|…
|
|e$B<h$j=P$7$F$_$k$H!”<!$N$h$&$K$J$j$^$9!#e(B
|
|% ./ruby -ve ’
|def proc_call(&b)
| b.call
|end
|def proc_return1
| proc_call{return 42}+1
|end
|p proc_return1()
|’
|ruby 1.9.0 (2006-06-17) [i686-linux]
|42
|
|e$B$3$l$,e(B 43 e$B$K$J$k$Y$-$@$He(B test.rb e$B$K=q$$$F$“$k$N$G<:GT$7$F$$e(B
|e$B$k$o$1$G$9$,!”$3$l$C$F$d$C$Q$je(B return e$B$O$=$l$,=q$$$F$"$k%a%=%Ce(B
|e$B%I$r=*N;$9$k$3$H$K$7$F!"e(B42 e$B$N$[$&$,$h$/$J$$$G$7$g$&$+e(B?

e$B$^$C$?$/$=$NDL$j$G$9!#%F%9%H$N$[$&$rD>$7$^$9!#e(B

|return e$B$r=q$$$?%a%=%C%I$NCf$r8+$k$@$1$Ge(B return e$B$,$I$&F0$/$+e(B
|e$B$o$+$i$J$$$N$O$h$/$J$$$H;W$$$^$9!#e(B

e$B$^$"!"86B’E*$K$Oe(Blambdae$B0J30$G:n$i$l$?%V%m%C%/$+$i$N%j%?!<%s$Oe(B
e$B$=$l$r0O$`%a%=%C%I$N=*N;$H$$$&$3$H$K$7$?$$$N$G$9$,!“0lHL2=$9e(B
e$B$k$N$Oe(Bdefine_methode$B$N$h$&$JNc30$,$”$C$FFq$7$$$G$9$M!#e(B

                            e$B$^$D$b$He(B e$B$f$-$R$me(B /:|)

Tanaka_A · June 19, 2006, 2:49am

In article [email protected],
Yukihiro M. [email protected] writes:

e$B$^$C$?$/$=$NDL$j$G$9!#%F%9%H$N$[$&$rD>$7$^$9!#e(B

e$B:Y$+$$%3%_%C%H$r$*4j$$$7$^$9!#e(B

e$B%3%_%C%H$G$-$J$$M}M3$O$"$j$^$;$s$h$Me(B?

|return e$B$r=q$$$?%a%=%C%I$NCf$r8+$k$@$1$Ge(B return e$B$,$I$&F0$/$+e(B
|e$B$o$+$i$J$$$N$O$h$/$J$$$H;W$$$^$9!#e(B

e$B$^$"!"86B’E*$K$Oe(Blambdae$B0J30$G:n$i$l$?%V%m%C%/$+$i$N%j%?!<%s$Oe(B
e$B$=$l$r0O$`%a%=%C%I$N=*N;$H$$$&$3$H$K$7$?$$$N$G$9$,!“0lHL2=$9e(B
e$B$k$N$Oe(Bdefine_methode$B$N$h$&$JNc30$,$”$C$FFq$7$$$G$9$M!#e(B

e$B$&$%$`!#$J$k$[$I!#e(B

Tanaka_A · June 20, 2006, 1:12am

e$B$^$D$b$He(B e$B$f$-$R$m$G$9e(B

In message “Re: [ruby-dev:28756] not ok iterator 84 –
./sample/test.rb:1128”
on Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:13:28 +0900, “Nebata” [email protected]
writes:

e$B8=:_:n6HCf$G$9!#e(B

Tanaka_A · June 19, 2006, 4:16pm

e$B$M$P$?$G$9!#e(B
make test e$B$G<:GT$7$^$9!#e(B
ruby 1.9.0 (2006-06-19) [i386-bccwin32]

./sample/test.rb:1137: unexpected break
not ok iterator 84 – ./sample/test.rb:1128
test failed

e$B3:Ev$N2U=j!Je(B1128e$B!Ae(B1137e$B9T!K$O!"0J2<$N$H$*$j$G$9!#e(B

ljump_test(true, get_block{break})
ljump_test(true, lambda{break})

def exit_value_test(&block)
block.call
rescue LocalJumpError
$!.exit_value
end

test_ok(45, exit_value_test{break 45})

e$B$H$j$"$($:$*CN$i$;$^$G!#e(B

Tanaka_A · June 20, 2006, 3:47am

e$B$J$+$@$G$9!#e(B

At Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:09:58 +0900,
Yukihiro M. wrote in [ruby-dev:28763]:

|./sample/test.rb:1137: unexpected break
|not ok iterator 84 – ./sample/test.rb:1128
|test failed

e$B8=:_:n6HCf$G$9!#e(B

e$B$3$l$K4X$7$F$O$3$&$G$7$g$&$+!#e(B

Index: eval.c

RCS file: /pub/cvs/ruby/src/ruby/eval.c,v
retrieving revision 1.899
diff -U 2 -p -r1.899 eval.c
— eval.c 17 Jun 2006 14:50:03 -0000 1.899
+++ eval.c 17 Jun 2006 16:38:08 -0000
@@ -4630,5 +4630,4 @@ break_jump(VALUE retval)
while (tt) {
switch (tt->tag) {

case PROT_THREAD:
case PROT_YIELD:
case PROT_LOOP:

@@ -4638,4 +4637,5 @@ break_jump(VALUE retval)
JUMP_TAG(TAG_BREAK);
break;

case PROT_THREAD:
case PROT_FUNC:
  tt = 0;

Tanaka_A · June 20, 2006, 8:15am

e$B$^$D$b$He(B e$B$f$-$R$m$G$9e(B

In message “Re: [ruby-dev:28766] Re: not ok iterator 84 –
./sample/test.rb:1128”
on Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:45:30 +0900, [email protected] writes:

|> e$B8=:_:n6HCf$G$9!#e(B
|
|e$B$3$l$K4X$7$F$O$3$&$G$7$g$&$+!#e(B

e$B$=$l$GNI$+$C$?$N$+$J!#$J$s$+Bg5,LO$J%Q%C%A$r@hDx%3%_%C%H$7$^e(B
e$B$7$?!#e(B