Nginx deployments survey

Hello,

We had a pretty packed 2012 in regards to nginx development. We’ve got a
lot of feedback too from a variety of users.

However as we gear up for the new development cycle in 2013, we’d
appreciate a lot if you could spare 7-10 minutes of your time and take a
look at our online survey:

http://nginx-survey.questionpro.com/

This survey will help us greatly to define goals and adjust priorities
in 2013 and to make nginx better.

Many thanks in advance!


Andrew A.
nginx


nginx mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Done!
Thanks for the excellent work in the past 2012!

2013/1/9 Andrew A. [email protected]:

Hai Andrew,

Am 09-01-2013 11:01, schrieb Andrew A.:

Hello,

[snipp]

http://nginx-survey.questionpro.com/

This survey will help us greatly to define goals and adjust
priorities in 2013 and to make nginx better.

Many thanks in advance!

It would be nice to have a survey response analyse and what that means
to nginx roadmap.

Best regards
Aleks

On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:35 PM, Aleksandar L. wrote:

Many thanks in advance!

It would be nice to have a survey response analyse and what that means to nginx
roadmap.

Definitely. But first we need more responses to make it statistically
valid :slight_smile: And then we’ll definitely plan to make a blog post or something
with an aggregated summary and notes about roadmap.

Thanks a lot for those participating!

On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:41 PM, itpp2012 wrote:

Done! maybe something to think about, allow a feature request to be
sponsored, for example SiT has this, if many sponsor a request it gets done
faster or if few sponsor a request, it requires higher sponsor fees to get
it done.

Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071

Thanks for completing the survey and thanks for the suggestion. We
actually have this, though it’s currently structured a bit differently
(single/few sponsors per feature vs. crowdfunding)

During 2012 the following features were sponsored:

  • SPDY (Automattic)
  • OCSP Stapling (GlobalSign, Comodo, DigiCert)
  • Chunked transfer encoding on input (sponsor preferred to refrain from
    public announcement)
  • WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be
    disclosed)

Done! maybe something to think about, allow a feature request to be
sponsored, for example SiT has this, if many sponsor a request it gets
done
faster or if few sponsor a request, it requires higher sponsor fees to
get
it done.

Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Andrew A. [email protected]
wrote:

http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071
public announcement)

  • WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be disclosed)

nginx mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

  • WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be
    disclosed)
    Are we expecting by this week !

–Tarak

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs