I know this has been talked about before, but never satisfactorily (and
just
to preempt - “or” isnt “and”). Is there any reason for not enabling
"and"s
in “if” conditions? Are there any plans to do so?
-jf
–
In the meantime, here is your PSA:
“It’s so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not
help.”
– Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation
I know this has been talked about before, but never satisfactorily (and
just
to preempt - “or” isnt “and”). Is there any reason for not enabling
"and"s
in “if” conditions? Are there any plans to do so?
On Jul 21, 2008, at 1:28 AM, Jeffrey ‘jf’ Lim wrote:
I know this has been talked about before, but never satisfactorily
(and just to preempt - “or” isnt “and”). Is there any reason for not
enabling "and"s in “if” conditions? Are there any plans to do so?
if 1 == 1 && 2 == 2; puts “this worked”; end
this worked
=> nil
– Josh
Sean A. wrote:
On Jul 21, 2008, at 1:28 AM, Jeffrey ‘jf’ Lim wrote:
I know this has been talked about before, but never satisfactorily
(and just to preempt - “or” isnt “and”). Is there any reason for not
enabling "and"s in “if” conditions? Are there any plans to do so?