Mswin32's nan_test is broken by r22579


#1

e$B$3$s$K$A$O!"$J$+$`$ie(B(e$B$&e(B)e$B$G$9!#e(B

e$B2<5-$NJQ99$G$9$,!"e(Bmswin32e$B$Ge(Bsample/test.rbe$B$Ne(Bnan_teste$BFb$G<:GT$7e(B
e$B$^$/$k$N$G!“ITMW$J%A%’%C%/$8$c$J$+$C$?$_$?$$$G$9!#e(B
VC++e$B$G$O=>Mh$N%A%’%C%/$r9T$&$h$&$KLa$7$?$$$N$G$9$,!”$=$l$G$$e(B
e$B$$$G$7$g$&$+e(B?

In message “[ruby-cvs:29797] Ruby:r22579 (trunk): * numeric.c (flo_eq):
remove unnecessary NaN check using isnan().”
on Feb.24,2009 02:15:18, removed_email_address@domain.invalid wrote:

Modified files:
trunk/ChangeLog
trunk/numeric.c

e$B$=$l$G$O!#e(B


#2

e$B$3$s$K$A$O!"$J$+$`$ie(B(e$B$&e(B)e$B$G$9!#e(B

In message “[ruby-dev:38091] mswin32’s nan_test is broken by r22579”
on Feb.26,2009 13:42:54, removed_email_address@domain.invalid wrote:

VC++e$B$G$O=>Mh$N%A%’%C%/$r9T$&$h$&$KLa$7$?$$$N$G$9$,!"$=$l$G$$e(B
e$B$$$G$7$g$&$+e(B?

e$BFC$KH?1~$b$J$$$h$&$J$N$G!"e(Bcommite$B$7$^$7$?!#e(B
e$B$J$*!"e(BVC++7e$B0J9_$K$O$3$NLdBj$O$J$$$h$&$G$9!#e(B

e$B$=$l$G$O!#e(B


#3

e$B$^$D$b$He(B e$B$f$-$R$m$G$9e(B

In message “Re: [ruby-dev:38099] Re: mswin32’s nan_test is broken by
r22579”
on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:42:17 +0900, “U.Nakamura”
removed_email_address@domain.invalid writes:

|> VC++e$B$G$O=>Mh$N%A%’%C%/$r9T$&$h$&$KLa$7$?$$$N$G$9$,!"$=$l$G$$e(B
|> e$B$$$G$7$g$&$+e(B?
|
|e$BFC$KH?1~$b$J$$$h$&$J$N$G!"e(Bcommite$B$7$^$7$?!#e(B
|e$B$J$*!"e(BVC++7e$B0J9_$K$O$3$NLdBj$O$J$$$h$&$G$9!#e(B

e$B8+Mn$H$7$F$^$7$?!#$"$j$,$H$&$4$6$$$^$9!#e(B