Licence question regarding GPLv2 Ruby script

Hi all,

The Ruby beautifier script
(http://www.arachnoid.com/ruby/rubyBeautifier.html) is released under
the GPLv2 licence.

I understand what the GPLv2 means for a source code which has to be
compiled and so on like the Ruby interpreter. In the case of a Ruby
script, I’m not sure to understand correctly all the licence terms.

If I execute only the script from my application (an IDE like
application) to format a Ruby source, do I have to release my
application under the GPLv2 licence ?

Thanks in advance.

Hi,

In message “Re: Licence question regarding GPLv2 Ruby script”
on Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:46:23 +0900, anonymous
[email protected] writes:

|The Ruby beautifier script
|(http://www.arachnoid.com/ruby/rubyBeautifier.html) is released under
|the GPLv2 licence.
|
|I understand what the GPLv2 means for a source code which has to be
|compiled and so on like the Ruby interpreter. In the case of a Ruby
|script, I’m not sure to understand correctly all the licence terms.
|
|If I execute only the script from my application (an IDE like
|application) to format a Ruby source, do I have to release my
|application under the GPLv2 licence ?

In short, I don’t think so.

          matz.

Hello,

On 7/6/07, anonymous [email protected] wrote:

If I execute only the script from my application (an IDE like
application) to format a Ruby source, do I have to release my
application under the GPLv2 licence ?

See this FAQ:
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation

In short: no, you don’t have to. :slight_smile:

– Kristoffer

Kristoffer Lundén wrote:

See this FAQ:
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation

In short: no, you don’t have to. :slight_smile:

– Kristoffer

Thanks Matz and Kristoffer for your replies.
The link to the GPL FAQ makes things more clear.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs