Just wondering... server size?

There’s been a lot of talk about server scaling, deployment woes, shared
hosts, VPS setups, etc. on this list. So, I thought I’d throw in a
question of my own.

I have an old Thinkpad lying around in my collection of odds and ends…
it’s an 800 MHz Pentium III with 384MB of RAM and a 12GB hard disk.
It’s not doing much, so I’m tempted to ask. Would it make sense to
revive this machine as a setup for serving one or more Rails
applications within an Intranet environment?

I don’t mind changing the hard drive (though I know 12GB is enough for
most things right now) but I am averse to upgrading the RAM (old RAM is
really expensive). I was thinking of grabbing either the Ubuntu 6.06
Server CD or the Rails Live CD (was it being done by Ezra? Is it
ready?) and using that as the base (I am hoping that the hardware in the
Thinkpad will all be detected).

Does anyone have any experience or opinion about things that may get in
the way?
Cheers
Mohit.

I don’t mind changing the hard drive (though I know 12GB is enough for
most things right now) but I am averse to upgrading the RAM (old RAM is
really expensive). I was thinking of grabbing either the Ubuntu 6.06
Server CD or the Rails Live CD (was it being done by Ezra? Is it
ready?) and using that as the base (I am hoping that the hardware in the
Thinkpad will all be detected).

Does anyone have any experience or opinion about things that may get in
the way?

Unless there’s a lot of disk activity, I imagine most of it will end up
in
ram so your old slow disk won’t be a problem… and after that it seems
to me that machine has more power than a lot of the shared hosting
providers give you…

I’d say the more important question is how many users? And how critical
is the app if the laptop should die?

-philip

On 9/28/06, Mohit S. [email protected] wrote:

I have an old Thinkpad lying around in my collection of odds and ends…
it’s an 800 MHz Pentium III with 384MB of RAM and a 12GB hard disk.
It’s not doing much, so I’m tempted to ask. Would it make sense to
revive this machine as a setup for serving one or more Rails
applications within an Intranet environment?

My gut feeling is that it will deliver acceptable performance for a
small
user population.

I think its a great idea BTW - any anecdotal info on rails usage in a
H/W
limited environment is good. Especially single CPU systems that host
the DB too.

Richard C. wrote:

user population.

I think its a great idea BTW - any anecdotal info on rails usage in a H/W
limited environment is good. Especially single CPU systems that host
the DB too.

Hi Philip & Richard,

Thanks for the replies. User population is not a problem right now. My
company is reaally small right now. So, it’s not a problem. We’re
looking at about 2 people. I’m going to be running my development blog
(Typo), Pandora for ‘collaborative book writing’, a small app for
logging my meetings, and internal development stuff. I’m thinking
perhaps 4 - 8 applications running at a time. But, then, the hit count
is probably less than 5 concurrent connections.

As for the other question, how critical is it if it dies on me… umm,
application loss for a few days is acceptable right now… and data loss
can be mitigated, I guess, by a good backup plan, no?

Cheers,
Mohit.

This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.

| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs