Joining two tables giving ambigous column error on mysql

Hi,

I am doing a join of two tables with a column with same name in both. I
am
using “includes” to have a full join. This is giving ambiguous column
error. The columns cannot be removed from either of those and renaming
any
of the two would involve two many changes. So, is there any way this can
be
resolved?

Regards,
Sumit

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Sumit S.
[email protected] wrote:

I am doing a join of two tables with a column with same name in both. I am
using “includes” to have a full join. This is giving ambiguous column error.
The columns cannot be removed from either of those and renaming any of the
two would involve two many changes. So, is there any way this can be
resolved?

Better context please.

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Sumit S. <
[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

I am doing a join of two tables with a column with same name in both. I am
using “includes” to have a full join. This is giving ambiguous column
error. The columns cannot be removed from either of those and renaming any
of the two would involve two many changes. So, is there any way this can be
resolved?

try this

Foo.includes(:bar).order(‘foos.name, bars.name’).where(‘foos.name = ?
AND
bars.name = ?’, ‘fooname’, ‘barname’)

just specify the table you are trying to access.

To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/jq7KYxfa_9cJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

On 7 December 2012 09:54, Jordon B. [email protected] wrote:

Better context please.

Table 1:
id, name, email, ip_address

Table 2:
id, order_name, ip_address

When I am joining these two tables. I receive ambiguous column error.

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:17 PM, sumit srivastava <
[email protected]> wrote:

I am doing a join of two tables with a column with same name in both. I

just specify the table you are trying to access.

How to write test cases for such errors? Is it possible?

If you’re going to ask me, I personally think that this specific error
should not be written a test case.
In the first place, the code will not run if there is such an error so
that
code shouldn’t be committed.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Jim Ruther N. [email protected]
wrote:

am using “includes” to have a full join. This is giving ambiguous column
just specify the table you are trying to access.

How to write test cases for such errors? Is it possible?

If you’re going to ask me, I personally think that this specific error
should not be written a test case.
In the first place, the code will not run if there is such an error so that
code shouldn’t be committed.

Well, no, that’s not really the test you want to write.

The test to write is (before you’ve implemented the (bad?) code) one
that will compare a given initial condition (setting test data in
tables) will return the expected value (a data set with the combined
tables). Often writing the test will enable you to determine how to
write the code, and foresee potential problems.

Thanks. Got it fixed.

Regards
Sumit S.

The power of imagination makes us infinite…

On 7 December 2012 10:05, Jim Ruther N. [email protected] wrote:

error. The columns cannot be removed from either of those and renaming any

How to write test cases for such errors? Is it possible?