Doesn’t mention Ruby directly but does talk about whats hip (LAMP which
I guess means we can include Ruby).
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?.
htm
Stephen
Doesn’t mention Ruby directly but does talk about whats hip (LAMP which
I guess means we can include Ruby).
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?.
htm
Stephen
I sent them the following comment:
Protege (protege.stanford.edu) is an interesting case in point. It
is a portable Knowledge Base (e.g., ontology editing) framework,
written in Java. However, it may be accessed via web services and
Java’s BSF (Bean Scripting Framework). So, scripts can be used to
extend Protege, use it as a server, etc.
-r
Stephen K. wrote:
Doesn’t mention Ruby directly but does talk about whats hip (LAMP which
I guess means we can include Ruby).
Nope. At least not when I see the acronym used.
Rarely have I seen a LAMP discussion that bothers to explain that one
might also consider coding with a non-P* language, or using Postgres, or
running under Lighttp, for example.
Which is a shame; technology selection by acronym is probably not an
enlightened decision procedure (‘LAMP Considered Harmful’).
But, as AJAX has shown, many people prefer to gulp down a buzzword than
digest a full plate of technical details.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2005/tc20051213_042973.
htm
It made me think of a phrase from earlier times:
“Java is the COBOL of the '90s”
James
–
http://www.ruby-doc.org - Ruby Help & Documentation
Ruby Code & Style - Ruby Code & Style: Writers wanted
http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jamesbritt.com - Playing with Better Toys
http://www.30secondrule.com - Building Better Tools
Hello.
James B.:
Rarely have I seen a LAMP discussion that bothers to explain that one
might also consider coding with a non-P* language, or using Postgres,
or running under Lighttp, for example.
Or even change all four components, ending up with FLPR
(FreeBSD, lighttpd, PostgreSQL, Rails): http://flpr.org/ :o)
Cheers,
– Shot
James B. [email protected] wrote:
Rarely have I seen a LAMP discussion that bothers to explain that one
might also consider coding with a non-P* language, or using Postgres, or
running under Lighttp, for example.
We oughta popularise the R* (read: R-star) stack - Ruby and whatever
else you like.
martin
In message [email protected], Shot - Piotr
Szotkowski [email protected] writes
Or even change all four components, ending up with FLPR
(FreeBSD, lighttpd, PostgreSQL, Rails): http://flpr.org/ :o)
Some of you won’t like this… What about WISR?
Windows, IIS, SQL Server, Ruby.
Not exactly open source though is it?
Mind you the acronym is nice. WISeR.
Stephen
James B. wrote:
Stephen K. wrote:
Doesn’t mention Ruby directly but does talk about whats hip (LAMP which
I guess means we can include Ruby).
On Dec 14, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Stephen K. wrote:
Mind you the acronym is nice. WISeR.
Stephen
Stephen K.
Object Media Limited http://www.objmedia.demon.co.uk/software.html
Computer Consultancy, Software Development
Windows C++, Java, Assembler, Performance Analysis, Troubleshooting
How about LAZR, Linux, Apache, Zsh, Ruby
Cheers-
-Ezra Z.
Yakima Herald-Republic
WebMaster
http://yakimaherald.com
509-577-7732
[email protected]
LARD. gotta make it pronouncable.
LADR ? Linux, Apache, Dynamic languages, Relational datastores ???
j.
On 12/14/05, Ezra Z. [email protected] wrote:
Object Media Limited http://www.objmedia.demon.co.uk/software.html
http://yakimaherald.com
509-577-7732
[email protected]
–
“Remember. Understand. Believe. Yield! → http://ruby-lang.org”
Jeff W.
LADR = Ladder , pretty pronounceable. ( we build upwards )
Puby, or LARD or LAMR … all negative connotations. … puby … just
reeks
of teenage angst.
although, who knows, having somthing like LARD might work … sometimes,
you
need a good hook to get people to remember something …
j.
On 12/14/05, JB Eriksson [email protected] wrote:
-Ezra Z.
–
“Remember. Understand. Believe. Yield! → http://ruby-lang.org”Jeff W.
–
“Remember. Understand. Believe. Yield! → http://ruby-lang.org”
Jeff W.
JB Eriksson [email protected] wrote:
LARD. gotta make it pronouncable.
On 12/14/05, Jeff W. [email protected] wrote:
LADR ? Linux, Apache, Dynamic languages, Relational datastores ???
And they said J2EE was too fat
martin
LARD. gotta make it pronouncable.
Free
Unix
Bash
Apache
Ruby
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:12:39AM +0900, Kero wrote:
LARD. gotta make it pronouncable.
Free
Unix
Bash
Apache
Ruby
I like it.
–
Chad P. [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
unix virus: If you’re using a unixlike OS, please forward
this to 20 others and erase your system partition.
On Dec 15, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Kero wrote:
LARD. gotta make it pronouncable.
Free
Unix
Bash
Apache
Ruby
+1
-Ezra Z.
Yakima Herald-Republic
WebMaster
http://yakimaherald.com
509-577-7732
[email protected]
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:12:45PM +0900, Jeffrey S. wrote:
Free
Tools
Such as
Unix and
C:
Kernighan’s
Software
That one’s hard to say “no” to.
–
Chad P. [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
unix virus: If you’re using a unixlike OS, please forward
this to 20 others and erase your system partition.
Stephen K. wrote:
Not exactly open source though is it?
Mind you the acronym is nice. WISeR.
But don’t forget:
Many
Insiders
Currently
Rubying
Originally
Started
On
Free
Tools
Such as
Unix and
C:
Kernighan’s
Software
Yeah, I like that
+1.
j.
On 12/15/05, Ezra Z. [email protected] wrote:
Ruby
–
“Remember. Understand. Believe. Yield! → http://ruby-lang.org”
Jeff W.
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs