Hey guys, great to be part of such a great community! I look forward to
learning Ruby alongside all of you!
I’ve very recently picked up ruby and have been reading a book called
“Learn to Program”(2005) by Chris P… Basically, it’s a hands on guide
to Ruby. So I’ve been going through the basic programs with no problem,
up until now. I’ve been trying at a program for about an hour now, to no
prevail and was hoping you guys could lend me a hand.
The program asks the user to input their first, middle and last names in
separate strings and displays how many characters are in the combined
three names, in theory. I have no issues obtaining the string and
displaying them, but somewhere along the path of converting the string
to an integer I get messed up.
Now, I’ll share some versions of this failed program that have yielded
errors (dashed line’s indicate another program):
I get the “Can’t convert Fixnum into string (Type error)” for the first
two
puts ‘Enter your first, middle and last name:’
name1 = gets.chomp
name2 = gets.chomp
name3 = gets.chomp
names1 = name1.length
names2 = name2.length
names3 = name3.length
puts ‘There are ’ + names1.to_i + names2.to_i + names3.to_i
puts ’ character’s in your name!’
puts ‘Enter your first, middle and last name:’
name1 = gets.chomp
name2 = gets.chomp
name3 = gets.chomp
puts ‘There are ’ + (name1.length).to_i + (name2.length).to_i +
(name3.length).to_i
puts ’ character’s in your name!’
And I also had another one (I must have accidently overwritten it) that
converted the strings to integers, by the “.length” method, and back to
strings and added them. Which yielded no error, but instead simply added
the string numbers together (5+6+4=564 instead of 5+6+4=15)
I was just wondering if somebody could take a look at this code and
point me in the right direction.
Much appreciated,
Bruce
Here’s a small hint:
(((str + int => str) + int => str) + int => str)
(str + (int + (int + int => int) => int) => str)
Also, String#length returns an int, so you should never need to call
.to_i
on it.
Sent from my phone, so excuse the typos.
Matthew K. wrote in post #1095671:
Here’s a small hint:
(((str + int => str) + int => str) + int => str)
(str + (int + (int + int => int) => int) => str)
Also, String#length returns an int, so you should never need to call
.to_i
on it.
Sent from my phone, so excuse the typos.
Er, that’s a conceptual hint, by the way. You can’t actually add an int
to a string.
(However, str + int.to_s works fine…)
Ahh, thank you Matthew! That was just the push I needed!
I don’t know what I was thinking before, brain fart perhaps, but I was
unnecessarily converting back and forth between string and integer.
Anyway, this is the winning program:
puts ‘Enter your first, middle and last name:’
name1 = gets.chomp
name2 = gets.chomp
name3 = gets.chomp
names = name1.length + name2.length + name3.length
puts ‘There are ’ + names.to_s + ’ character’s in your name!’
Now onto greater obstacles! Once more, thanks Matthew!
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013, at 7:43, Bruce P. wrote:
puts ‘There are ’ + names.to_s + ’ character’s in your name!’
puts “There are #{names} character’s in your name!”
is more efficient imho.
Best Regards:
Zoltan
Harry, Zoltan: Thank you both! This book that I’m reading is a pretty
barebones, basic introduction to the Ruby language.
Shortcuts and different approaches are always as helpful as anything!
And I also had another one (I must have accidently overwritten it) that
converted the strings to integers, by the “.length” method, and back to
strings and added them. Which yielded no error, but instead simply added
the string numbers together (5+6+4=564 instead of 5+6+4=15)
I was just wondering if somebody could take a look at this code and
point me in the right direction.
A hint.
p “Bruce”.length.class #> Fixnum
p (1+2+3).to_s.class #> String
Harry
FYI, you don’t need to escape the single quote when inside double
quotes.
“’” is the same as “’”
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Bruce P. [email protected]
wrote:
I don’t know what I was thinking before, brain fart perhaps, but I was
unnecessarily converting back and forth between string and integer.
names = name1.length + name2.length + name3.length
Or just: (name1 + name2 + name3).length
Or: [name1, name2, name3].join.length
puts ‘There are ’ + names.to_s + ’ character's in your name!’
Uh, there’s no apostrophe in the plural of “character”. FWIW.
(Sorry, personal pet peeve.)
“Hajdú Zoltán” [email protected] wrote in post #1095676:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013, at 7:43, Bruce P. wrote:
puts ‘There are ’ + names.to_s + ’ character's in your name!’
puts “There are #{names} character's in your name!”
is more efficient imho.
Best Regards:
Zoltan
This is fine one 
I should have spotted that :o
I guess I was thinking in strings rather than sentences 
Hassan S. wrote in post #1095774:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Bruce P. [email protected]
wrote:
I don’t know what I was thinking before, brain fart perhaps, but I was
unnecessarily converting back and forth between string and integer.
names = name1.length + name2.length + name3.length
Or just: (name1 + name2 + name3).length
Or: [name1, name2, name3].join.length
puts ‘There are ’ + names.to_s + ’ character's in your name!’
Uh, there’s no apostrophe in the plural of “character”. FWIW.
(Sorry, personal pet peeve.)
I caught this after doing it in, maybe 6 of my prior programs.
I’m surprised nobody caught that sooner!
Am 07.02.2013 07:43, schrieb Bruce P.:
name3 = gets.chomp
names = name1.length + name2.length + name3.length
puts ‘There are ’ + names.to_s + ’ character’s in your name!’
You should make it a habit from the start to use more accurate
variable names, like
characters = name1.length + name2.length + name3.length
or: character_number, total_characters, total_character_number, …
puts “There are #{characters} characters in your name!”
stomar
On 8 February 2013 06:39, Bruce P. [email protected] wrote:
Or: [name1, name2, name3].join.length
puts ‘There are ’ + names.to_s + ’ character's in your name!’
Uh, there’s no apostrophe in the plural of “character”. FWIW.
(Sorry, personal pet peeve.)
I caught this after doing it in, maybe 6 of my prior programs.
I’m surprised nobody caught that sooner!
Well, we’re not marking your assignments for you. 
Here is another approach that is Rubyish, albeit slightly excessive:
[name1, name2, name3].inject(0) {|sum, name| sum + name.length }
–
Matthew K., B.Sc (CompSci) (Hons)
http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
ABN: 59-013-727-651
“You’ll never find a programming language that frees
you from the burden of clarifying your ideas.” - xkcd
on the side-track in case the name has only one character then the word
‘character’ is usually written as character(s) rather than as an
apostrophe
this visible abbreviation is a valid way to create two options.
to write it this way will (s) need to be escaped?
for singular and plural to be viable alternatives?
can (s) be escaped by either “(s)” or " " ?
puts needs singular and plural pronouns and tense
to print ‘there is one ,’ or else put ‘there are…’
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Timothy G. [email protected]
wrote:
on the side-track in case the name has only one character then the word
‘character’ is usually written as character(s) rather than as an apostrophe
this visible abbreviation is a valid way to create two options.
to write it this way will (s) need to be escaped?
for singular and plural to be viable alternatives?
can (s) be escaped by either “(s)” or " " ?
puts needs singular and plural pronouns and tense
to print ‘there is one ,’ or else put ‘there are…’
In a pry console, including one Rails file:
1.9.3 (main):0 > require ‘active_support/core_ext/string/inflections’
=> true
1.9.3 (main):0 > count = 1
=> 1
1.9.3 (main):0 > “there #{‘is’.pluralize(count)} #{count}
#{‘character’.pluralize(count)}.”
=> “there is 1 character.”
1.9.3 (main):0 > count = 3
=> 3
1.9.3 (main):0 > “there #{‘is’.pluralize(count)} #{count}
#{‘character’.pluralize(count)}.”
=> “there is 3 characters.”
!! oops, that’s a surprising omission, but
1.9.3 (main):0 > ActiveSupport::Inflector.inflections{|inflect|
inflect.plural “is”, “are” }
…
1.9.3 (main):0 > “there #{‘is’.pluralize(count)} #{count}
#{‘character’.pluralize(count)}.”
=> “there are 3 characters.”
HTH,
Am 07.02.2013 22:25, schrieb Matthew K.:
Here is another approach that is Rubyish, albeit slightly excessive:
[name1, name2, name3].inject(0) {|sum, name| sum + name.length }
IMHO maybe a little too cryptic for a complete newbie.
stomar
hay that is concise and explicit many thanks
now i am reading docs about //inflections.rb
i grasp your steps under the heading
“String inflections define new methods on the String class”
where ‘…/inflections.rb’ has fifteen methods
your solution shows some neat ways it can be adapted
in our case both numbers and strings are in singular and plural
thankfully the output grammar can be corrected to suit either
alternative
this was a hitch that is solved in ruby
it appears quite a fiddly issue more than it really is
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Hassan S. <
Am 08.02.2013 00:40, schrieb Timothy G.:
on the side-track in case the name has only one character then the word
‘character’ is usually written as character(s) rather than as an apostrophe
this visible abbreviation is a valid way to create two options.
to write it this way will (s) need to be escaped?
for singular and plural to be viable alternatives?
can (s) be escaped by either “(s)” or " " ?
puts needs singular and plural pronouns and tense
to print ‘there is one ,’ or else put ‘there are…’
-
You do not have to escape (' and)’ in single or double
quoted strings.
-
Generally, you can handle “decisions” with a conditional expression:
if total_characters == 1
message = “There is 1 character…”
else
message = “There are #{total_characters} characters…”
end
puts message
(Just one of many ways to do it.)
You should first learn these basic language features before
playing around with Rails libraries.