Is there a better way to write { yield }

Ruby
1

Is there a better way to write something like

def meth(a,b,c)
:
:
other_meth(d) { yield }
:
:
end

That { yield } has some redundancy.

Thanks

Stephan

2

On May 20, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Stephan W. wrote:

That { yield } has some redundancy.

Thanks

Stephan

Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

def meth(*a, &b)
other_method(*a, &b)
end

a @ http://codeforpeople.com/

3

Stephan W. wrote:

That { yield } has some redundancy.
That form has the advantage, IIUC, that no Proc object is created, so
it’s a little more efficient. (Search the archives for block versus
proc.) Also, Rdoc can pick up the yield (and its arg) automatically.