Is the maintainer discharging rule approved? and about matrix.rb

Ruby Development
1

Yuguie$B$G$9!#e(B

e$B@h$K$*CN$i$;$7$?$h$&$Ke(B[ruby-core:25764]e$B$G%a%s%F%J2rG$%W%m%;%9$rDs0F$7$^$7$?!#e(B
e$BFC$KH?BP$O$J$$$h$&$J$N$G>5G’$5$l$?$H8+$J$7$FNI$$$G$7$g$&$+!#e(B

e$B$5$F!":#8=:_$3$Ne(B3e$B%v7n%k!<%k$Ke(Bmatrix.rbe$B$,Dq?($9$k$H8@$&$3$H$Ge(BMarc-Andre
Lafortunee$B$+$i6l>p$r$b$i$$$^$7$?!#e(B
e$B$^$@%W%m%;%9Ds0F$,>5G’$5$l$?$3$H$r3NG’$b$7$F$$$J$+$C$?$N$GB(:B$NE,MQ$OITE,@Z$@$H;W$$$^$9$,!"$H$j$"$($:!"e(B
#1515, 1517, 1518, 1526, 1532
e$B$,J|CV$5$l$F$$$^$9!#e(B

design
issuee$B$b4^$^$l$^$9$N$Ge(Brejecte$B$9$k$b$N$b$"$m$&$+$H;W$$$^$9$,!“e(Bclosee$B$9$k$N$G$”$le(Brejecte$B$9$k$N$G$"$l!“e(B
e$BAa5^$K2?$i$+$NBP1~$r4|BT$7$?$$$G$9!#$D$$$G$Ke(Birbe$B4XO”$Ge(B
#988, #1832, #2121
e$B$bJ|CV$5$l$F$$$^$9!#e(B2e$B=54V0JFb$0$i$$$G2?$+$7$ie(Bissuee$B$N=hM}$r;O$a$F$$$?$@$1$k$H=u$+$j$^$9!#e(B

2

e$B@.@%$G$9!#e(B

e$B@PDM7=<ye(B wrote:

e$B$=$&$J$s$G$9$h$M$'e(B… e$B%Q%C%A$bBg:n$G$9$7e(B, e$B$J$s$+$I$5$/$5$K$^$.$l$F$$$me(B
e$B$$$mF~$C$F$$$k$s$G$9$h$Me(B…

e$BLdBj$4$H$K%Q%C%A$rJ,3d$7$m$H!“e(B
e$B$H$j$”$($:e(B reject e$B$9$k$N$b%"%j$@$H;W$$$^$9$h!#e(B

3

e$B$1$$$8$e!w$$$7$D$+$G$9e(B.

In [ruby-dev:39446] the message: “[ruby-dev:39446] Is the maintainer
discharging rule approved? and about matrix.rb”, on Oct/08 23:39(JST)
Yugui writes:

Yuguie$B$G$9!#e(B

e$B$5$F!":#8=:_$3$Ne(B3e$B%v7n%k!<%k$Ke(Bmatrix.rbe$B$,Dq?($9$k$H8@$&$3$H$Ge(B
Marc-Andre L.e$B$+$i6l>p$r$b$i$$$^$7$?!#e(B
e$B$^$@%W%m%;%9Ds0F$,>5G’$5$l$?$3$H$r3NG’$b$7$F$$$J$+$C$?$N$GB(:B$NE,MQe(B
e$B$OITE,@Z$@$H;W$$$^$9$,!"$H$j$"$($:!"e(B
#1515, 1517, 1518, 1526, 1532
e$B$,J|CV$5$l$F$$$^$9!#e(B

e$B$`!<e(B. e$B$?$7$+$Ke(B…
e$B$3$N$"$$$@e(B,
irbe$B$N%P%0$r$$$/$D$+BP=h$7$?$H$-$Ke(Bmatrixe$B$b$d$m$&$H;W$C$?$Ne(B
e$B$G$9$,e(B, e$B$$$m$$$m$"$C$F@h?-$P$7$K$J$C$F$7$^$$$^$7$?e(B…

design issuee$B$b4^$^$l$^$9$N$Ge(Brejecte$B$9$k$b$N$b$"$m$&$+$H;W$$$^$9$,!"e(B

e$B$=$&$J$s$G$9$h$M$'e(B… e$B%Q%C%A$bBg:n$G$9$7e(B,
e$B$J$s$+$I$5$/$5$K$^$.$l$F$$$me(B
e$B$$$mF~$C$F$$$k$s$G$9$h$Me(B…

closee$B$9$k$N$G$"$le(Brejecte$B$9$k$N$G$"$l!"e(B
e$BAa5^$K2?$i$+$NBP1~$r4|BT$7$?$$$G$9!#e(B

e$BN;2r$G$9e(B. e$B4hD%$j$^$9e(B.

e$B$D$$$G$Ke(Birbe$B4XO"$Ge(B
#988, #1832, #2121

#2121e$B$Oe(Bmathne$B$G$9$h$Me(B.

e$B$bJ|CV$5$l$F$$$^$9!#e(B2e$B=54V0JFb$0$i$$$G2?$+$7$ie(Bissuee$B$N=hM}$r;O$a$F$$$?e(B
e$B$@$1$k$H=u$+$j$^$9!#e(B

e$BN;2r$G$9e(B.

__
---------------------------------------------------->> e$B@PDMe(B
e$B7=<ye(B <<—
---------------------------------->> e-mail: [email protected] <<—

4

e$B$1$$$8$e!w$$$7$D$+$G$9e(B.

In [ruby-dev:39449] the message: “[ruby-dev:39449] Re: Is the
maintainer discharging rule approved? and about matrix.rb”, on Oct/09
01:11(JST) “NARUSE, Yui” writes:

e$B@.@%$G$9!#e(B

e$B$=$&$J$s$G$9$h$M$'e(B… e$B%Q%C%A$bBg:n$G$9$7e(B, e$B$J$s$+$I$5$/$5$K$^$.$l$F$$$me(B
e$B$$$mF~$C$F$$$k$s$G$9$h$Me(B…

e$BLdBj$4$H$K%Q%C%A$rJ,3d$7$m$H!“e(B
e$B$H$j$”$($:e(B reject e$B$9$k$N$b%"%j$@$H;W$$$^$9$h!#e(B

e$B$J$k$[$Ie(B…

e$B$H$O$$$(e(B, e$B$3$N>l9g$Oe(B, e$B$"$^$j$K$bLdBj$KBP=h$7$J$$$N$Ge(B,
e$BLdBjItJ,$Ne(B e$B%Q%Ce(B
e$B%Ae(B + e$B%"%k%U%!e(B e$B$r:n$C$F$/$l$?$C$F46$8$@$H;W$&$N$Ge(B,
e$BJ86g$O8@$($J$$$N$G$9e(B
e$B$1$I$Me(B…

__
---------------------------------------------------->> e$B@PDMe(B
e$B7=<ye(B <<—
---------------------------------->> e-mail: [email protected] <<—